HISTORY OF REVIVALISM

CONCLUSION

Why are revivals needed? The answer is legalism. Legalism is the cause of many problems in the church. It is the cause of a dead orthodoxy and a cold, unloving Christianity. To correct these effects of legalism there have arisen in the church various revival movements such as pietism, the evangelical awakening, the deeper life movement, revivalism, etc. None of these movements went to the source of the deadness, coldness and unlovableness but often just reinforced the cause -- legalism. The great outpouring of the Spirit starting at the beginning of the twentieth century has been constantly burdened and limited by the frequent relapses into the same legalism. And the source of the legalism in practice is the legalism of the theology. Practical legalism is the result of theological legalism. The problem is not too much theology but bad theology, legalistic theology. This theological legalism has misunderstood the Gospel of our salvation. With the present move of the Spirit, the time has come to remove the cause of this practical legalism by clearing the theological legalism out of our theology and again recovering the Bibical understanding of the Gospel of our salvation. Such a theological renewal should be the natural accompaniment of the move of the Spirit of God today and could produce a reformation comparable to the Protestant Reformation of the 16th century. This paper is an attempt to contribute to such a theological renewal and to prepare for the last great revival.

Salvation by the Grace of God

The gospel of our salvation is the gospel of the grace of God (Acts 20:24). The salvation announced in the gospel of God is salvation by the grace of God. This stands in opposition to salvation by works; salvation is not by the works of the law (Rom. 3:20; Eph. 2:8-9; Titus 3:5; etc.). In Eph. 2:8-9, Paul contrasts this salvation by grace with salvation by works.

"8 For by grace you have been saved through faith;
and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God,
9 not as a result of works, that no one should boast."
(Eph. 2:8-9 NAS)
A salvation by works is earned; it is merited.
"4 Now to the one who works his wages is not reckoned according to grace [as a gift]
but according to debt [something owed since it was earned]
5 But to the one who does not work,
but believes in Him who justifies the ungodly,
his faith is reckoned for righteousness." (Rom. 4:4-5 ERS).
The works that are supposed to earn salvation are more than just good works (good deeds or acts); they are meritorious works; they are good deeds that earn salvation. Each good work is regarded as having a certain quantity of merit attached to it; when the good work is done, the merit is imputed or reckoned to the account of the person performing the act. Correspondingly, each evil or bad work is regarded as having a certain quantity of demerit or negative merit (penalty) attached to it so that the demerit is reckoned to the account of the person doing the evil work (sin). At the final judgment each person's account is balanced -- the merits and demerits are weighed against each other. If the merit outweighs the demerit, that person is saved -- he has earned eternal life. If the demerit outweighs the merit, that person is condemned -- he is punished eternally for his sins. This merit scheme underlies and is implied by all teaching that salvation is by works.

The Bible very clearly teaches that salvation is not by works ( Eph. 2:8-9; Titus 3:5). Salvation is the gift of God, by His grace received through faith. Man cannot be saved by his meritorious good works; he cannot earn salvation by his works. This is the clear and explicit teaching of Scripture. Salvation by grace and salvation by meritorious works are mutually exclusive and opposing ways of salvation.

"But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works;
otherwise grace would longer be grace." (Rom. 11:6 NAS)

The Misunderstanding of the Grace of God

Now, if we ask why man cannot be saved by his works, that is, what is the reason man cannot earn salvation by his meritorious works, the usual answer given to this question is that apart from God's grace man is not able to do good works by which he can earn salvation. Man, it is usually said, is not only not able to do good works, but he is able only to sin apart from the grace of God.

Now, the curious implication of this answer is that if a man were able to do good works -- able not sin -- then he could earn salvation and be saved by his meritorious works. This implication is made explicit in the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church since the time of Augustine in the early fifth century, that by the grace of God, which is infused into a man at his baptism, and renewed by the sacraments, he is able to do good works by which salvation (eternal life) may be earned. Accordingly, salvation is ultimately and fundamentally by works even though the grace of God makes possible the meritorious works.

It was this teaching that the Protestant Reformers opposed. They rejected the idea that grace was something infused into man to make it possible for him to earn salvation. Grace, said the Reformers, is God's unmerited favor, and salvation (eternal life) was a gift to be received by faith. But, they said, that eternal life was earned by the active obedience of Christ during His life on earth. This "merits of Christ" is imputed to the believer's account when he first believes in Christ. Thus salvation is still ultimately and fundamentally by meritorious works. It is true that they said that it was not by our works and it was a gift received by faith. But salvation was still by works -- not by our works but by the meritorious works of another, Jesus Christ. Christ by his active obedience earned for us eternal life. It is a vicarious salvation by works. This explanation of salvation like the earlier Roman Catholic explanation mixes grace and works, which Paul says cannot be done or grace will no longer be grace ( Rom. 11:6). And as it turned out in the history of Protestantism, this strong dynamic concept of God's grace as God's love in action is reduced to the weak idea of grace as unmerited favor.

Salvation is not by meritorious works, not because a man is not able to do them, but because God does not deal with mankind on the basis of the merit scheme. As Jesus made clear in his parable of the householder (Matt. 20:1-16), God does not act toward us on the basis of our merit but on the basis of His generosity. And because God does not treat mankind according to their desserts, but according to His love, He often puts the least deserving before the more deserving. "The last will be first and the first last." (Matt. 20:16; 19:30; Mark 10:31; Luke 13:30)

The Apostle Paul in opposing salvation by works refers to meritorious works as "the righteousness of the law" (Rom. 10:5; Phil. 3:6, 9) and as "the works of the law" (Rom. 3:20; 4:2-5; Gal. 3:2, 5, 10). The law was legalistically considered to be the standard by which the merits of good works can be determined. This is a distortion of the Mosaic law and is a characteristic of legalism.

The Misunderstanding of the Need for Salvation

The doctrine of the sinful nature was introduced into Christian theology by Augustine in the early fifth century A.D. to explain why man can not save himself by his meritorious works. Instead of denying that salvation has anything to do with meritorious works, Augustine assumed that salvation is by meritorious works and he taught that since the fall because of his inherited corrupt or sinful nature, man cannot do meritorious works to earn salvation apart from the grace of God. The grace of God infused into man's will by the sacraments enables him to earn eternal life. But Augustine assumption is wrong. According to the Scriptures ( Eph. 2:8-9; Rom. 4:4-5), salvation is not by meritorious works, eternal life is not earned by meritorious works, and the doctrine of the sinful nature is unnecessary to deny that man can save himself. According to the Scriptures, man cannot save himself because he cannot make himself alive, not because he cannot do meritorious works. The law cannot deliver one from death or sin, neither can the law produce life or righteousness ( Gal. 3:21). There is no salvation by the law.

The sinful nature is not needed to explain why man cannot save himself, because the law was not given by God for salvation. God gave the law, not for salvation from sin, but for the knowledge of sin (Rom. 3:19); that is, to show what should be man's right personal relationship to God and to his fellow men (Deut. 6:5; Lev. 19:18; Matt. 22:37-40). This knowledge does not save man but only shows man what he ought to be but it cannot make him to be that. Salvation is only through Jesus Christ by the Holy Spirit, not by the law and by human self-effort (the flesh). Jesus Christ is Life, and he who has Him has life and is alive to God.

"11 And this is the testimony,
that God gave us eternal life,
and this life is in His Son.
12 He who has the Son has life,
and he who has not the Son has not life."
(I John 5:11-12).
The Scriptures teach that Adam as the head of the human race brought spiritual and physical death on the whole human race (Rom. 5:12-19; I Cor. 15:21-22); but this was not a punishment for the sins of the human race, neither personally for their own sins nor as a participation in Adam's sin ( Rom. 5:13-14). Neither does the Scriptures teach that man inherited a corrupt or sinful nature from Adam. On the contrary, the Scriptures teaches that man inherited death, spiritual and physical, from Adam.
"12 Therefore, as through one man
sin entered into the world,
and death through sin,
and so death passed unto all men,
because of which all sinned: --
13 for until the law sin was in the world;
but sin is not reckoned when there is no law.
14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses,
even over those who had not sinned
after the likeness of the transgression of Adam,
who is the type of him who was to come."
(Rom. 5:12-14 ERS; See also I Cor. 15:21-22).
All men have sinned because they are spiritually dead. This is what the Apostle Paul says in the last clause of Romans 5:12 ERS, which clause is incorrectly translated in our English translations as "because all sinned." In the Greek of this verse, there is a relative pronoun in the last clause which has not been translated. If it were translated, the whole clause in English would read, "because of which all sinned." In the Greek, it is clear that the antecedent of the relative pronoun "which" is the word "death" in the preceding clause. (The antecedent of a relative pronoun is the word to which the pronoun refers.) The last clause would then be equivalent to "because of death all sinned" and would mean that all men sinned because of death.

But how is this possible? How can men sin because of death? Let me explain how this is possible by referring to another passage in the writings of the Apostle Paul, Galatians 4:8. In this passage Paul is reminding the Galatian Christians of their condition before they became Christians.

"Formerly, when you did not know God,
you were in bondage to beings that by nature are no gods." (Gal. 4:8)
Not to "know God" personally as a living reality is to be spiritually dead. And a man is "in bondage to beings that are no gods" when he chooses them as his gods. He is in bondage to them because he does not personally know the only true God, that is, because he is spiritually dead.

Let me put it another way. Every man must have a god. Man, by the very structure of his freedom, must choose something to be the ultimate criterion of all his decisions. This is because every choice a man makes is made with reference to some criterion. That is, behind every decision as to what a man will do or think there is a reason, a criterion of decision. And the ultimate reason for any decision -- practical or theoretical -- must be given in terms of some particular criterion, an ultimate reference or orientation point in or beyond the self or person making the decision. This ultimate criterion is that person's god. In this sense, every man must have a god. Every man, if he hasn't already, must choose something as his god. Now if he doesn't know the true God personally as a living reality, that is, if he is spiritually dead, and since he must have a god, he will choose a false god. He will choose some part or aspect of reality as his god, deifying it.

"They exchanged the truth about God for a lie
and worshipped and served the creature rather than the creator" (Rom. 1:25).
The choice of a false god and consequent personal allegiance and devotion to it is what the Bible calls idolatry. An idol does not have to be an image of wood, stone or metal. It may be money, wealth, power, pleasure, education, the family, the state, democracy, reason, experience, science, the moral law, etc. It may be anything that is good in its proper place and is exalted as the ultimate good, taking the place of the true God, who is the ultimate Good (Matt. 16:17). An idol is a false god, and a false god may be anything that takes the place of the true God, anything a man chooses as his ultimate criterion of decision, exalting it as God in the place of the true God. It is any substitute or replacement for the true God in a man's life. Since a false god usurps the place of the true God in a man's life, idolatry is the basic sin. This sin is directly against God; it is a direct insult to the true God and an affront to His divine majesty. No more serious sin could be imagined than this one. Since it is the most serious sin, it is therefore the most basic. This is the main reason that idolatry is the first sin prohibited by the Ten Commandments. "Thou shalt have no other gods besides me" (Exodus 20:3). Idolatry is also the basic sin because this sin leads to other sins. It leads to other sins since a person's god, being his ultimate criterion of decision, ultimately controls the direction and character of a man's decisions. The choice of a wrong god will lead to other wrong choices. That is, the idol that a man sets up in his heart (Ezek. 14:3-5) will affect the character and quality of his whole life. In other words, if in his heart a man clings to a false god, his actions and speech will show it. In this way also idolatry is the basic sin.

Now we can understand how death leads to sin. If a man is spiritually dead, separated from God, and since he must choose a god, he will usually choose a false god. If a man does not know the true God, the true God will not be a living reality to him. And lacking this personal knowledge of the true God as a living reality, man does not have the adequate reason for choosing the true God as his ultimate criterion of decision. God Himself is the only adequate reason for choosing Him. He cannot be chosen for any other reason than Himself. For then He would not be God but rather that reason for which He is chosen would be god. Only a living encounter with the true and living God can produce the situation in which God Himself may be chosen. If God Himself is the only adequate condition for the choice of Himself, then apart from a personal revelation of God Himself, man will usually choose as his god that which seems like god to him from among the creation around him or from the creations of his own hands or mind. Man does not necessarily have to sin but he usually will. Spiritual death is not the necessary cause but the basis or condition for his choice of a false god. (The Greek word translated "because" in the last clause of Romans 5:12 ERS means "on the basis of" or "on the condition of".)

Man is not responsible for becoming spiritually dead because he did not choose this state. He inherited spiritual death from Adam just as he inherited physical death. But he is responsible for the god he chooses. The true God has not left man without a knowledge about Himself (Rom. 1:19-20). This knowledge about God leaves man without excuse for his idolatry. But it does not save him because it is knowledge about the true God and not a personal knowledge of the true God. But even though a man is not responsible for becoming spiritually dead, he is responsible for remaining in the state of spiritual death when deliverance is offered to him in the person of Jesus Christ. If he refuses the gift of eternal life in Christ Jesus, he must reap the harvest and receive the wages of his decision, eternal death.

"For the wages of sin is death,
but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord"
(Rom. 6:23).
If a man refuses the gift of spiritual and eternal life in Christ Jesus and continues to put his trust in a false god, remaining in spiritual death, then after he dies physically, at the last judgment he will receive the result of his decision, eternal death, separation from God for eternity.

The Biblical Undertanding of Salvation

How does this view of death and sin affect our understanding of the meaning of salvation? We have seen that spiritual death like physical death is not the result of a man's own personal sins. On the contrary, a man sins as a result of this spiritual death inherited from Adam. That is why he needs to be saved. Man is dead spiritually and dying physically. He needs life; he needs to be made alive -- he needs to be raised from the dead. And if he receives life, if he is made alive to God, death which leads to sin will be removed and man can be saved from sin. Thus salvation must be understood to be primarily from death to life and secondarily from sin to righteousness.

Now this salvation (primarily from death to life and secondarily from sin to righteousness) is exactly what God accomplished through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, His Son. Jesus entered into our spiritual death in order that as He was raised from the dead, we might be made alive with and in Him ( Eph. 2:5). And by saving us from spiritual death, Christ saves us from sin. It is by taking away the spiritual death which leads to our sin that God takes away our sin. Jesus died for our sins -- literally -- to take them away (John 1:29). What the Old Testament sacrifices could not do (Heb. 10:1-4), the death of Christ has done; His death took away sins. The blood of Jesus (His death) cleanses us from our sins (I John 1:7). We are delivered from sin itself, not just from its consequences. We were saved from our trust in false gods when we put our trust in Jesus Christ and in the true God who sent him. Did we not "turn from idols to serve the living and true God"? (I Thess. 1:9) When we were spiritually dead we trusted in and served those things that were not God -- money, power, sex, education, popularity, pleasure, etc. But when we turned in faith to the risen Christ, we entered into life, leaving behind those false gods. The risen Jesus Christ is now our Lord and our God (John 20:28). The basic sin of trust in false gods has been taken away.

The death and resurrection of Jesus was the means by which God removed death -- the barrier to knowing the true God personally and knowing His love. Now God reveals Himself to us in the preaching of the gospel, making us spiritually alive to Himself when we receive Jesus Christ who is life (John 14:6; I John 5:12). To be spiritually alive is to know God, and to know God personally is to trust Him. "God is love" (I John 4:8, 16) and to know God is to know His love and this love begets trust. The trust in God that God's love invokes in us is righteousness (Rom. 4:5, 9b); it relates us rightly to God. Just as trust in a false god is sin, so trust in the true God is righteousness. This righteousness of faith (Rom. 4:13) is that right personal relationship to God that results from faith in the true God. To trust in God is to be righteous (Rom. 4:5). To believe God is to be set right with God, faith in God being reckoned as righteousness (Rom. 4:4-5).

The Misunderstanding of Salvation

One of the implications of Augustine's doctrine of the sinful or corrupt nature of man is that salvation is entirely the work of God (monergism), since man, because of his sinful nature, is totally unable to do good works in order to earn salvation by them. Not only is the grace of God the work of God but so is faith, since salvation is "by grace through faith" ( Eph. 2:8). According to Augustine, the faith that receives the grace of God is also the work of God. This monergism totally eliminates the human will from any part or place in salvation. Augustine understood the human will, not as a choice between sin and righteousness, but choice according to one's nature: the choice of sin if one's nature is sinful, the choice of righteousness if one's nature is good. So accordingly all men's choices are sin because their nature is sinful. And the grace of God must enable the will of man if he is going to do meritorious works to earn his salvation. This efficient grace is received through the sacraments.

Furthermore, in Augustine's teaching, grace is reduced to something that enables the human will to do good works so that it can earn salvation. These views of Augustine concerning salvation follow from his view of human nature as sinful or corrupt. The Calvinist Reformers denied this view of grace and sees grace as the unmerited favor of God in which God gives to the elect the righteousness or merits earned for them by Christ's active obedience. That is, God in Christ has earned for them the salvation that they themselves cannot earned because of their sinful nature. But the Calvinist is wrong; righteousness is not merit but right personal relationship to God through faith ( Rom. 4:4-5). And God puts man into this right personal relationship to Himself by His grace, not by vicarious meritorious works earned for them by another. The grace of God is not just the unmerited favor of God, but it is the love of God in action to save man from death to life. Jesus said,

"Truly, Truly, I say to you,
he who hears My word and believes Him who sent Me has eternal life;
he does not come into judgment, but is passed from death to life."
(John 5:24).
The Apostle Paul writes,
"4 But God who is rich in mercy,
out of the great love which he loved us,
5 even when were dead in our failures,
made us alive together with Christ
(by grace you have been saved)" (Eph. 2:4-5 ERS).
And according to Rom. 5:12d ("because of which [death] all sinned" ERS) all men sin because of death ("the sting of death is sin", I Cor. 15:55-56). And this death is not the sinful nature. These are two totally different concepts. The sinful nature is the nature of man that is sinful and the nature of man is what man is - that which makes man what he is and what he does. The nature of anything is that essence of the thing that determines what it is and how it acts. The sinful nature is that nature of man, and because it is sinful, makes him sin. Death, on the other hand, is a negative relationship of separation. Physical death is the separation of man's spirit from his body, spiritual death is the separation of man's spirit from God, and eternal death ("the second death," Rev. 20:14) is the eternal separation of man from God. Spiritual death is the opposite of spiritual life, which is to know personally the true God and Jesus Christ whom He has sent. Jesus prayed in His great intercessor prayer,
"This is life eternal, that they may know Thee, the only true God,
and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent." (John 17:3 NAS).
That is, spiritual death is not to know personally the true God and Jesus Christ whom He sent. Knowledge is a relationship between the knower and that which is known; it is not a nature nor the property of a nature. Now it should be clear that spiritual death is not the sinful nature; it is a negative relationship between man and God and not the nature of man.

Spiritual death is not the necessary cause but the ground or condition of sin, the choice of a false god. The Greek preposition epi translated "because" in the last clause of Rom. 5:12 ERS means "on the condition of" or "on the basis of". It does not imply any necessary or deterministic causal connection between death and sin. Man sins by choice, not of necessity. In this state of spiritual death, he chooses freely his false god and thus sins. Then his false god puts him into bondage; he becomes a slave of sin, his false god being his slave master. The Calvinistic doctrine of Total Depravity or Total Inability misinterpretes this slavery of sin and equates it with the sinful nature or the results of the sinful nature, and turns the slavery of sin into a determinism and the denial of human freedom of choice.

Calvinism's view of salvation is also monergistic, that is, God alone is active in salvation, because it believes that since man's nature is sinful and man does what his nature is, then all the acts of man are sinful and he cannot do any righteous act to earn salvation. Therefore, God alone must earn it for him. Calvinism, denying the Augustinian view that God does these meritorious acts by the grace of God that man receives from God through the sacraments, asserts that God alone does these meritorious acts through the active obedience of Christ; Christ has earned salvation for us. God alone is active in man's salvation. Not only is the grace of God the work of God but so is faith, since salvation is "by grace through faith" (Eph. 2:8). According to the Calvinistic doctrine of Irresistble Grace, the faith that receives the grace of God is also the work of God. But the phrase in Eph. 2:8, "and that not of yourselves, it is a gift of God", refers to salvation and not to faith. In the Greek of this verse, the demonstrative pronoun translated "that" agrees in gender (masculine) with the verbal participle translated "have been saved", and not with the noun translated "faith" which is feminine. Salvation is the gift which is received by faith, not earned by meritorious works. Even though faith is the act or choice of man, it is not a meritorious work which can earn salvation.

The Misunderstanding of the Christian Life

The Protestant Reformers rejected the Roman teaching that grace is given by the sacraments to enable the will of man to earn his salvation by meritorious works and taught that salvation is by grace through faith and that the grace of God regenerated the believer, giving him a new nature, by which he can do good works, but not to earn salvation and eternal life (Christ had earned this for them by His active obedience), but to show that they are saved and regenerated. According to their teaching, the believer has two natures, a sinful nature and a new nature, and the experience recorded in Romans 7 was interpreted as the struggle between these two natures.

Although most Reformed theologians interpret this struggle of Romans chapter 7 as the normal Christian life, other Reformed theologians reject this interpretation of the Romans 7 experience and teach the suppression of the works of the flesh (sinful nature) by the power of the Holy Spirit. But in this case the Christian is still left under the law as a rule and standard of life and the "walk in the Spirit" is interpreted as nothing more than Spirit-empowered law-keeping. According to this teaching, the Holy Spirit is given to the Christian to empower him to keep the law and to make him morally perfect, conforming to the divine standard given in the law. This legalistic interpretation of the Christian life is the source of many of the psychological problems that Christians have today.

This legalistic explanation of salvation and of the Christian life leaves the believer under the law, and under the dominion of sin ( Rom. 6:14). And this legalistic explanation of Romans 7 also leaves the believer with no deliverance from this struggle, contrary to the clear teaching of Scirpture that there is deliverance:

"24 O wretched man that I am!
who shall deliver me from the body this death?
25a I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord!"
(Rom. 7:24-25a KJV)
John Wesley (1703-1791) in the 18th century recognized that there was deliverance from the Roman 7 experience, and he put forth the teaching that there was a second work of grace (the first work of grace was conversion), which he called entire santification, that would eradicate the sinful nature, cleansing from inbred sin and enabling those experiencing this work of grace to live without conscious or deliberate sin (Christian Perfection). But his explanation of this deliverance as the eradication of the sinful nature assumes that the struggle of Roman 7 is caused by the sinful nature. This assumption is wrong; the cause of the struggle is not the sinful nature, but being under law.

The moral and ethical result of legalism is the moral dilemma: the contradiction between what man is and what he ought to be. Since man falls short of the ideal of moral perfection, the standard of righteousness, the law, he is faced with the disparity between the real and the ideal self, between what he is and what he ought to be. The Christian statement of this dilemma is given classic expression by the Apostle Paul in his famous analysis of the experience of the man under law in Romans chapter 7 --

"The good that I would, I do not.
And the evil which I would not, that I do." (Rom. 7:19)
This predicament has led the legalistic theologian to conclude that sin is intrinic to human nature. Rabbinic Judaism, for example, developed the theory of the evil nature or "yetzer hara." Augustine used the doctrine of original sin (originale peccatum) or inherited inborn sinful nature to explain why men always fall short of the divine standard. But this doctrinal expedient of the sinful nature is unnecessary since the moral dilemma can be explained by the fact that a false god always betrays its worshippers into the very opposite of what they expected from the false god (Isa. 44:9,10; 45:16, 17, 20, 21). The man under law who practically deifies the law (Rom. 7:22, 25) and looks to it to save him from sin and give him life (Rom. 7:10) finds that the law cannot save him, but on the contrary discovers that the law arouses sin and becomes the opportunity for sin which results in death (Rom. 7:5, 8-11).

And not only that, but also since death (primarily spiritual death) leads to sin ( Rom. 5:12d ERS), the man under law is practically in spiritual death (the law separates him from God), and sin is the result of that death. This is what the Apostle Paul concludes at the end of his discussion of the legalistic struggle in Romans 7.

"7:21 So I find it to be a law that
when I want to do right, evil is present with me.
7:22 For I delight in the law of God according to the inner man,
7:23 but I see in my members another law
at war with the law of my mind and
taking me captive to the law of sin which is in my members."
(Rom. 7:21-23 ERS)
There are three laws presented here in this passage.
  1. The first law is the law of sin (verse 21).
    Since sin is not what the man under law wants to do, he concludes that sin must dwell in the members of his body rather than in his real inner self (Rom. 7:17-20).
  2. The second law is the law of God (verse 22)
    which the man under law delights in, which he agrees with his mind is right, good and holy (Rom. 7:12, 16); this is the law of the mind in the next verse.
  3. The third law is the "another law" (heteros -- another of a different kind;
    compare this with allos -- another of the same kind) --
    a law different from the first two laws but warring against the law of the mind -- the law of God -- and bringing the man under law into captivity to the law of sin.
    What is this third law? In the next verse we get a clue.
    "Wretched man that I am!
    Who will deliver me from the body of this death" (Rom. 7:24).
    This third law, this "another law", is the law of death.
    And this is confirmed in Romans 8:2 (NAS, margin) which says,
    "For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus
    has set me free from the law of sin and of death."
    The law of death brings the man who is under law into captivity to the law of sin.
    That is, death leads to sin, "because of which [death] all sinned" ( Rom. 5:12d ERS).
    "The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is the law" (I Cor. 15:55).
No sinful nature is necessary to explain the moral delimma; the man under law sins because he is spiritually dead; the law separates him from God. For the Christian to place himself under the law is practically like placing himself in death; it has the same results -- sin. For the Christian to be under law, the law has taken the place of the Holy Spirit; the law thus separates the Christian from God. Romans chapter 7 is not the normal Christian life; it is the struggle of the man under law, entrapped in the bondage of legalism. If the Christian falls into this legalism, there is deliverance.
"Thanks be to God through our Lord Jesus Christ" (Rom. 7:25a).

According Rom. 6:14, sin has dominion over the believer when he is under the law and the deliverance from the dominion of sin is to be under grace.

"For sin shall not have dominion over you:
for you are not under the law, but under grace." (Rom. 6:14)
The grace of God, God's love in action, delivers the believer from the dominion and slavery of sin by placing the believer back under the grace of God. God does this by not condemning the believer who is in Christ Jesus.
"There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus."
(Rom. 8:1).
Under the law, the law condemns those who sin; the law does not deliver those under the law from the dominion of sin. But God does not condemn them but places them back under grace and delivers them from the dominion of sin ("the law of sin") and of death ("the law of death") by the operation of the Spirit ("the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus").
"For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus
has set you free from the law of sin and of death." (Rom. 8:2 ERS).
The law separates the believer who is under law from God; this is practically the same as spiritual death. Thus the believer under law sins because he is practically spiritually dead. For the Christian to place himself under law is like placing oneself in spiritual death; the law has taken the place of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus and it has the same results as spiritual death -- it produces sin. Romans 7 is not the normal Christian life but is the abnormal or subnormal experience of the believer under law. But if the Christian falls into this legalism, there is deliverance.
"Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!" (7:25a).

Deliverance from Legalism

There are three steps that may be found in Romans 7:25b through 8:4 for deliverance from legalism:

"7:25b So then, I myself am a slave to the law of God with my mind,
but with my flesh I am a slave to the law of sin."
8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation for those in Christ Jesus.
8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus
has set you free from the law of sin and of death.
8:3 For what the law could not do,
in that it is weakened through the flesh,
God Himself, sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh
and concerning sin, condemned sin in the flesh,
8:4 in order that the righteous acts of law might be fulfilled in us,
who walk not according to the flesh but according to the Spirit." (ERS)
Step 1 - The recognition that legalism is the problem (Rom. 7:25b):
"So then, on the one hand, I myself with my mind am a slave to the law of God,
but on the other hand, with my flesh to the law of sin." ERS
To be delivered from legalism one must recognize that he himself is a slave to the law and a slave to sin, that is, that he is under law and sin has dominion over him (Rom. 6:14).
Step 2 - Deliverance from condemnation (Rom. 8:1):
"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus." NAS
God delivers from legalism through His word of unconditional love which says that there is no condemnation to those in Christ. This is a word of grace and places the Christian back under grace. Legalism conditions God's love by our sins. God says that His love is unconditioned by our sins. Therefore God does not condemn us for our failure under law but delivers us from under law and places us back under grace. For in His love, God delivers us from sin and death (Rom. 8:2) and thus from wrath which is condemnation.
Step 3 - Deliverance from law of sin and of death (Rom. 8:2):
"For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and of death." NAS
Paul here says that "the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus" has set him and his readers free from "the law of sin and [the law of] death." Paul, like other New Testament writers, uses the Greek word nomos (usually translated "law") in several different ways. The following are some of them.
  1. The first 5 books of the Old Testament, the Pentateuch (Matt. 12:5; Luke 2:23-24; 16:16; 24:44; Rom. 3:21b).
  2. The whole Old Testament (Rom.3:19 referring to the passages quoted in Rom.3:10-18 which are not just from the Pentateuch; John 10:34, quoting Psa. 82:6; I Cor. 14:21, quoting Isa. 28:11)
  3. The Mosaic covenant that God made with the children of Israel (Exodus 24:1-12; Rom. 2:12; 3:19; 4:13-14; Gal. 3:17-18).
  4. The Ten Commandments, the Decalogue (Exodus 20:1-17; Deut. 5:6-21; Matt. 5:18), sometimes improperly called the moral law.
  5. All the commandments of God, ceremonial as well as the Ten Commandments; all statutes and ordinances of the law of Moses (Luke 2:22; John 7:23).
  6. Teaching, instruction, guidance (Rom. 2:17, 18, 20, 23, 26); compare this with the meaning of the Hebrew word Torah which has the same meaning. As such it is that content of God's revelation (the Word of the Lord, Deut. 5:5; Psa. 119:43, 160) which makes clear man's relationship to God and to his fellow man. It provides guidance for man's actions in relationship to God and to his fellow man.
  7. Any commandment regulating conduct (Rom. 7:7, 8-9).
  8. A principle or power of action (Rom. 3:27; 7:21, 23, 25; 8:2).
This last use is the way Paul uses it here in this verse (Rom. 8:2). The Greeks and the Romans believed that the law had the power to force compliance with the law (Cicero, Laws, II, 8-10). In their view, the law was a principle or power of action which could by its action bring about what the law prescribed; it was not merely a description of or prescription for some action; the law made the action occur. This is the sense in which Paul speaks of "the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus" and of "the law of sin" and of "the law of death." These are not merely descriptions of how the Spirit or death or sin acted; they are powers that act and bring about certain actions. Thus the law or power of action of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus frees us from the law or power of action of sin and of death. In the next verse (Rom. 8:3), Paul says that the law of God is unable to make righteous; it does not have that power of action. And, as Paul says in Gal. 3:21, righteousness is not by the law because the law cannot make alive; the law does not have that power action either. According to Rom. 8:2, the law or the power of action of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus frees us from the law or power of action of sin and of death. Since death leads to sin, the Spirit delivers from sin by giving us life in Christ which is deliverance from death. The law is not able to do this - it cannot make alive; it is through the death of Christ (Rom. 8:3) who put an end to sin's reign over us ("condemn sin in the flesh") by his death for us (Rom. 6:6-10). The result (Rom. 8:4) is that the righteous acts of the law are fulfilled in us who walk not after the flesh but after the Spirit. To walk after the flesh is to try to do the righteous acts of the law by human effort ("the flesh"). The believer must not do it that way. By walking after the Spirit believer will fulfill the righteous acts of the law. He will love God with his heart, soul, and mind, with his whole being, and he will love his neighbor as he loves himself.

Wesley, while recognizing that there was deliverance from the Roman 7 experience, misunderstood that deliverance as an eradication of the sinful nature. He did not recognize that the cause of the Roman 7 experience was being under the law, not the sinful nature. And he did not recognize this cause because his explanation of the need for salvation was legalistic (all men are under the law and have sinned by transgressing that law) as was the explanation of Augustine and of the Prostestant Reformers. And his explanation of salvation was also legalistic: he believed that the passive obedience of Christ's death paid the penalty of men's sin and the active obedience of Christ's good works earned for us eternal life which is imputed to our account when we believe. Also his concept of Christian Perfection and Holiness was also a legalistic misinterpretation of the Christian Life as sinless perfection.

The doctrine of the sinful nature is not needed to explain why man cannot earn salvation by meritorious works of the law. And neither is the sinful nature needed to explain the struggle and defeat in Romans 7; the Christian cannot live by the law any more than can he be saved by the law. The law cannot produce righteousness because it cannot make alive; as the Apostle Paul says in Gal. 3:21:

"Is the law then against the promises of God?
Certainly not;
for if a law had been given which could make alive,
then righteousness would indeed be by the law." (Gal. 3:21)
The law cannot make alive to God; that is, the law cannot produce a real personal relationship to God of love for God and trust in Him. Only a real personal relationship to God through Jesus Christ by the Holy Spirit can produce righteousness, that is, the right relationship to God and to his fellow man. To try to live the Christian life by the law isolates the Christian from God (spiritual death) and the human self-effort (by the flesh) to live up to standard of law results in failure and sin. As right and good is the law, God did not give the law as a means of salvation nor to live the Christian life by it. So all attempts to do so will fail, as Romans 7 shows. The sinful nature is not the cause of this failure but the wrong use of the law. Romans 7 shows what happens when the law is used wrongly. The solution to this problem is not to try harder, but to abandon this wrong use of the law. And to turn to God's way of the Christian life; that is, to walk according to Spirit (by faith), and not according to the flesh (human self-effort) (Rom. 8:4; Gal. 5:25).

The views of Augustine and Calvinism, as well as Welsey's, totally depersonalize salvation, grace and faith. The Biblical view, on the other hand, is totally personal and dynamic; the grace of God is God's love in action to bring man into a personal relationship with God Himself and faith is man choosing to enter into that personal relationship. Spiritual and eternal life is this personal relationship between God and man, where the grace of God is God's side of the relationship and faith is man's side of the relationship. God initiates the personal relationship and a man must choose to enter into that personal relationship by faith, receiving God's gift of eternal life and trusting God and His love. Salvation is not a monergism, nor a synergism, where the grace of God enables man to do meritorious works, nor is the faith of man a meritorious work by which he earns the salvation. Salvation is God's act of grace which initiates the relationship and man's act of faith is in response to God's act, accepting the gift of God, eternal life. This relationship has nothing to do with earning something by meritorious works, either on God's or man's side. Grace and faith are just the two sides of the personal relationship between God and man; grace is God's side initiating and sustaining the relationship and faith is man's side in response to God's grace, entering into the personal relationship.

The Christian life is the continuation of this personal relationship where the believer walks by faith and acts upon the basis of God's sustaining grace and the personal guidance and empowering of the Holy Spirit. Grace and faith are relational concepts and are not just properties of either God or man. The grace of God is God acting in His love toward man and faith is man choosing to trust God and His love. Because of their underlying legalism, the views of Augustine and the Protestant Reformers, as well as Welsey's, have obscured and distorted this Biblical view of salvation and of the Christian life.

The Christian Life and Legalism

Legalism is a temptation and an obstacle to the walk in the Spirit by faith. As good and right as the law is (Rom. 7:10), this law is not man's highest good, and observing the Ten Commandments is not man's righteousness. God Himself is man's highest good, and trust in and love for God is his righteousness. This love fulfills the law (Rom. 13:8-10), which a legalistic living by the law does not do. Man's basic problem is not "Are you keeping the law?" but "Which god are you trusting?" Is it the true God or is it a false one? This is not just the problem of the non-Christian and the unbeliever but also the problem of the Christian. Many psychological problems that Christians have are the result of a divided loyalty. They are trying to hang onto the true God and a false god at the same time. This double-mindedness, this divided faith (James 1:7-8) makes a Christian psychologically and morally unstable and hinders his walk with the Lord.

And strange as it may seem, this is the situation behind the Romans 7 kind of experience of many Christians. As we observed above, the experience of Romans 7 is the experience of the man under law. And if a Christian is having this kind of experience, it is because he has placed himself under law which God says he is not under, for he is under grace ( Rom. 6:14). He is attempting to serve two masters at the same time: the law and the Holy Spirit. And it cannot be done ( Gal. 5:18). Being under law only creates psychological and moral problems: guilt on the inside and sin and failure on the outside. Being indwelt by the Holy Spirit, the Christian does not need to walk by the law but by the Spirit. The Christian's goal is not moral perfection but the fruit of the Spirit (Gal. 5:22-23). The Apostle Paul's question in Galatians 3:3 is particularly relevant and right to the point: "Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?"

Paul's obvious answer to this rhetorical question is "No". For "as you... have received Christ Jesus the Lord, so walk in Him" (Col. 2:6). By faith they have received Christ so they walk in Him by faith in Him. This walk is not the striving for moral perfection. Moral perfection is perfection by the flesh, by the works of the law, and is contrary and opposed to the fruit of the Spirit and the righteousness of faith (Gal. 5:19-21). The weakness, if not the error, of most Christian preaching and teaching is that it is an exhortation of the Christian to perfection by the flesh, by the works of the law. Having begun in the Spirit, the Christian is urged to seek moral perfection. The Holy Spirit is brought into this kind of preaching, if at all, as the source of power to enable the Christian to keep the law. This Spirit-empowered law-keeping is not what Paul means when he speaks of "walking according to the Spirit" (Rom. 8:4; see also Gal. 5:16, 25). To walk by the Spirit is to be led by the Spirit, and if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under law:

"But if you are led by the Spirit
you are not under the law." (Gal. 5:18).
To walk according to the Spirit is to make all one's decisions with reference to the Holy Spirit as He personally guides, fills and empowers the believer. The walk in the Spirit is the moment by moment walk of faith and personal trust in the God who personally by His Holy Spirit reveals and communicates Himself along each step of that walk. The "normal" Christian life is this walk according to the Spirit and not a legalistic Spirit-empowered law-keeping, but a biblical Spirit-filled law-fulfillment by love (Rom. 8:4; 13:10).

Christian legalism not only ignores the clear statements of the Scriptures that the Christian is not under law ( Rom. 6:14), but also ignores the equally clear statements of the Scriptures that the Christian is dead to the law.

"Likewise, my brethren, you have died to the law
through the body of Christ,
so that you may belong to another,
to him who has been raised from the dead
in order that we may bear fruit to God."
(Rom. 7:4; Gal 2:19)
Not only is the Christian dead to sin but is also dead to the law. Through Christ's death the believer has died to sin and to the law, and now in the resurrected Christ he is alive to God.
"But now we are discharged from the law,
dead to that which held us captive,
so that we serve not under the old written code
but in the new life of the Spirit." (Rom. 7:6)
The Christian has passed from under the reign of death and sin unto reigning in life in Christ Jesus (Rom. 5:17). The law was the rule in the dispensation of death (II Cor. 3:6-7); the letter kills and the law condemns. The Holy Spirit is the rule of life in the new dispensation of life (II Cor. 3:17-18). Since the Spirit gives life (II Cor. 3:6), the dispensation of life is the dispensation of the Spirit (II Cor. 3:8), the Era of the Spirit. Since the Christian has passed from death to life, he has passed from the rule of the law to the rule of the Spirit. The law as the rule of Christian life has no place in the Era of the Spirit. And if the law has no place in the Era of the Spirit, legalism as an idolatry and misunderstanding of the law has no place in the Era of the Spirit either.

The Christian and the Holy Spirit

True Christians (not nominal Christians, in name only) have the Holy Spirit. True Christians have accepted Christ and put their faith in Him and His death and resurrection. And as such they have received the Holy Spirit. He is the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus (Rom. 8:2). To be born again and to be alive to God is by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit does this by revealing Christ and convicting (convincing) the unsaved of their need for Christ (John 16:7-11); the Spirit presents Christ to the unbeliever in the preaching of the Gospel. If they receives Christ, they are made alive to God by the Spirit. To receive Christ is also to receive the Holy Spirit. Paul says in Romans 8:9 to the believers at Rome,

"But you are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit,
since the Spirit of God dwells in you.
If anyone have not the Spirit of Christ, this one is not his."
To be "in the Spirit" is to be saved, and to be "in the flesh" is to be unsaved (Romans 7:5).
But not everyone who has the Spirit dwelling in him is filled with Spirit; some are not "walking according to the Spirit", but "according to the flesh" (Romans 8:4; Gal. 5:16, 25). And to walk according to the flesh is to attempt to live the Christian life by human effort alone apart from the Spirit of God; such ones attempt to live up to the divine standard in the law. They are under law and thus experience only defeat and frustration ( Rom. 6:14 and Rom. 7:18-19). They are trying to do what only the Holy Spirit can enable them to do. To be under law is to walk according to the flesh (by human effort). To walk according to the Spirit and to be led by the Spirit is not to be under law:
"But if you are led by the Spirit
you are not under the law." (Gal. 5:18).
Those who walk according the Spirit bring forth the fruit of the Spirit. The fruit of the Spirit cannot be had apart from the Spirit; no human effort can produce that fruit. Those who walk according the Spirit fulfills the law without being under law. "For he who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law" (Rom. 13:8-10). The goal is not moral or sinless perfection (conforming to the divine standard in the law) but love: love of God and love of our neighbor. This goal can be reached only if one is filled with the Spirit (Eph. 5:18-20).

The Baptism with the Spirit

And a Christian is filled with the Spirit if he has been baptized with the Holy Spirit. The baptism with the Holy Spirit has been misunderstood as the second work of grace that eradicates the sinful nature. This is not what the phrase means in the New Testament. The phrase "to baptize with the Holy Spirit" was first used by John the Baptist (Matt. 3:11; Mark 1:8; Luke 3:16; John 1:33) of Him who was to come after John, that is, the Christ or Messiah. Luke reports in Acts that the risen Jesus said,

"John baptized with water,
but before many days you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit"
(Acts 1:5).
This is obviously a reference to the coming of the Holy Spirit at the first Pentecost, of which Jesus also said,
"But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you;
and you shall be my witnesses in Jerusalem
and in all Judea and Samaria
and to the end of the earth" (Acts 1:8).
This baptism with the Holy Spirit was an empowerment for service, to be His witnesses. Later, Peter refers to Pentecost as the baptism with the Spirit when he explains what happened at the conversion of Cornelius, the centurion:
"15 As I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell on them
just as on us at the beginning.
16 And I remembered the word of the Lord, how he said,
'John baptized with water,
but you shall be baptized with the Holy Spirit.'
17 If then God gave the same gift to them
as he gave to us when we believed in the Lord Jesus Christ,
who was I that I could withstand God?" (Acts 11:15-17).
How did Peter recognize that Holy Spirit had fallen on them and the gift of the Spirit? Because the same thing happened to them that happened to Peter and the others at Pentecost, they spoke with other tongues or languages (Acts 2:4; 9:44-47). This sign of the baptism with the Spirit of Cornelius, and those with him, was also the sign to Peter, and those with him, that the Spirit was also given to the Gentiles. Luke also refers to the coming of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost as being filled with the Spirit;
"3 And there appeared to them tongues as of fire,
distributed and resting on each one of them.
4 And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit
and began to speak in other tongues,
as the Spirit gave them utterance" (Acts 2:3-4).
This coming of the Holy Spirit to them, which is the baptism with the Spirit, is the initial in-filling of the Spirit. Later they were again filled with Spirit (Acts 4:31). We believe that each believer, like these first believers, may be baptized with the Spirit as the initial in-filling of the Holy Spirit and may be refilled with the Spirit as the Spirit sees fit. Paul exhorted the Ephesian believers to be filled with the Spirit (Eph. 5:18). If anyone objects to the use of the phrase "baptized with the Spirit" to refer this initial filling of the Spirit, I will not quibble with him, as long as he recognizes that Christian believers should be filled with the Spirit and that there must be a first filling of the Spirit which may occur at conversion or later. Whether one speaks in tongues at this first filling of the Spirit, which one may do as the Spirit leads, is between him (or her) and the Spirit. But I will tell you that if anyone makes an issue with God of not speaking with tongues, he may not be filled the Spirit until he yields. This yielding to the Spirit is the necessary condition for being filled with Spirit. Paul makes it clear in his letter to Romans that presenting our bodies and its members to God is the logical implication of our acknowledgment of Jesus as Lord and Savior (Rom. 6:13; 12:1-2); and that includes presenting or yielding one's tongue. This does not mean that the Christian believer has become morally perfect or that he must clean up his life before he can be filled with the Spirit; the Holy Spirit will take care of cleaning up the believer's life after he is filled with the Spirit.

One more point; speaking in tongues at the initial filling of the Spirit is not the gift of tongues of which Paul speaks in I Cor. chapters 12 to 14. While all believers may speak in tongues at the initial filling of Spirit, not all have the gift of tongues and the accompanying gift of interpretation of tongues. The Spirit distributes the gifts of the Spirit as he wills (I Cor. 12:11). As Paul makes clear in I Cor. 12, the gifts of the Spirit are manifestations of the Spirit in the body of Christ for the common good (I Cor. 12:7). The empowering of the gifts and ministries of the Spirit are to be concrete expressions of love for one another in the body of Christ and those outside. The preaching of Gospel should be accompanied by signs and wonders:

"3 It (the so great salvation) was declared at first by the Lord,
and it was attested to us by those who heard him,
4 while God also bore witness by signs and wonders
and various miracles and by gifts of the Holy Spirit
distributed according to his own will" (Heb. 2:3-4).