"If potential energy and kinetic energy are equivalent to heat, heat must also naturally be equivalent to kinetic energy and potential energy.... [Consequently] we will close our disquisition from the principle causa aequat effectum [the cause is adequate to the effect] and which are in accordance with all the phenomena of nature, with a practical deduction... How great is the quantity of heat corresponds to a given quantity of kinetic and potential energy?"Up to this point in his essay Mayer's presentation has been almost completely qualitative, and indeed was reminiscent of Scholastic philosophy of the Medieval Period. This is understandable, since Mayer himself had then no facilities for experimentation and the physicists of his time were quite uncooperative. But here, at the end of his essay, he proposes a quantitative test of his theoretical argument. Here is a chance for empirical verification. And the type of experiment that Mayer choose to be considered was the only one available at the time upon which the determination of the mechanical equivalence of heat could be based.
(1) Benjamin Thompson (1753-1814), better known as Count Rumford of Bavaria, in 1789, suggested this mechanical equivalence of heat, but he did not measure it. He apparently was content with showing that the quantity of heat produced in friction experiments (boring of canons) could be very large and the source of the heat thus generated was apparently inexhaustible.
(2) James Prescott Joule (1818-1889), a British amateur scientist, son of a well-to-do brewer, whose business he inherited, attempted to measure the mechanical equivalence of heat constant J. His motivation was religious - he said that it was "manifestly absurd to suppose that the powers with which God had endowed matter could be destroyed", and personally - he loved to experiment, and practically - he wanted to find a cheaper motive power for his brewery.(a) In 1843, Joule announced his first results to determine the value of the mechanical equivalence of heat constant, that is, the ratio of the work needed to operate an electric generator to the heat produced by the electric current thus generated. The value he obtained was 4510 joules/kcal.
(b) Later the same year, 1843, he measured the ratio of the mechanical work needed to maintain the flow of water through thin pipes to the heat of friction produced by the flow. The value he obtained this time was 4140 joules/kcal.
(c) In the next year, 1844, he measured the ratio of work needed to compress a gas to the heat produced. The value he obtained this time was 4270 joules/kcal.
(d) In 1847, he reported at a scientific meeting his experiments in which water or sperm oil in a heat-insulated container (a calorimeter) was stirred by a paddle wheel. The ratio of the work done to the heat of friction is 4200 joules/kcal. William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) at this meeting pointed up the significance of Joule's work.
(e) In 1848, he reported his experiments involving friction in water and in mercury and the friction of two iron disks rubbing together.
(f) In 1850, he summarized all his previous work and assigned a value of 4150 joules/kcal to the mechanical equivalence of heat.
Quantities | British, FPS | CGS | MKS | Hybrid |
---|---|---|---|---|
W = work done | foot-pounds | ergs | joules | joules |
Q = heat produced | BTU | calories, cal | kcal | calories, cal |
J = Joule's constant | 778.86 ft-lb/BTU | 4.18605 × 107 ergs/cal | 4.18605 × 103 joules/kcal | 4.18605 joules/cal |
(1) Joule in 1803 assumed "that the grand agents of nature are, by the Creator's fiat, indestructible; and that wherever mechanical force [energy] is expended, an exact equivalent of heat is always obtained."
(2) Julius Robert Mayer (1814-1889), a German physician, in 1842, presented the LCE in a long essay entitled Remarks on the energies of inorganic nature. He states: "Taking both properties together, we may say, causes [energies] are quantitatively indestructible and qualitatively convertible entities... Energies are therefore indestructible, convertible entities." This presentation was almost completely qualitative, using many philosophical arguments. Mayer's idea was not recognized for about 20 years.
(3) Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894), a German physiologist and physicist, in 1847 at the age of 26, extended the energy conservation principle to include all life processes as well as those of physics and chemistry. He did what Mayer had not quite done and what Joule had not attempted. That is, he showed by mathematical demonstration the precise intent of the validity of the conservation principle in various other fields (mechanics, heat, electricity, magnetism, physical chemistry, and astronomy). And with its aid he was able to derived explanations for old puzzles as well as to predict new and confirmable quantitative relations.
"The principle of the conservation of energy provided striking general connections among the sciences. It was perhaps the greatest step toward unity in science since Newtonian mechanics, and it was a powerful guide in the exploration of new fields. For this reason, and also because of its practical value, the principle may be regarded as one of the greatest achievements of the human mind."
[See Gerald Holton and Duane H. D. Roller,
Foundations of Modern Physical Science, p. 351.]
(1) Conservation of Mass.
(2) Conservation of Momentum:(a) Conservation of linear momentum, and(3) Conservation of Energy:
(b) Conservation of angular momentum.(a) Conservation of mechanical energy,(4) Conservation of Electrical Charge.
(b) Conservation of heat energy, and
(c) The law of mechanical equivalence of heat.
(1) the transfer of heat (Q) to or from an external source,Different systems carry out these processes in different ways, but the principle of the conservation of energy holds in every case. This fact of energy conservation is called the first law of thermodynamics.
(2) the storage of energy (U),
(3) the performance of work (W),
either by the system on its surroundings, or
by the surrounding on the system.
Energy cannot be created or destroyed,A convenient way of expressing the first law of thermodynamics in its application to a system that undergoes the above three kinds of characteristic processes is:
but may be converted from one form to another.
It is impossible to construct an engine, operating in cycles (that is, continuously) which does nothing other than take heat from a source and perform a equivalent amount of work.According to this law, then no engine can be completely efficient; some of its heat input must be ejected. The thermal efficience, e, of a heat engine is defined as the ratio of the work done to the heat absorbed during one cycle, that is,
It can be shown that the greater the efficiency
of any heat engine is capable of depends upon the temperature of its heat
source (Th) and of the temperature of its heat sink
(Tc), the reservoir to which it exhausts heat. That is,
e = 1 - Tc/Th, (12)
The greater the difference between these temperature, the more efficient
the engine. The second law is the consequence of this fact.
The direction of heat flow is from a reservoir at a high-temperature to a reservoir of heat at a low-temperature, regardless of the total heat content of each reservoir.This second statement may be considered as an alternate statement of the second law of thermodynamics.
This means that if we are to utilize the heat content of the atmosphere or of the oceans, we must first provide a reservoir at a lower temperature than theirs in order to extract heat from them. There is no reservoir in nature suitable for this purpose, for if there were, heat would flow into it until its temperature would reached that of its surroundings. To establish a low-temperature reservoir, a refrigator must be used, which is a heat engine running in reverse by using up energy to extract heat, and in so doing it will perform more work than that which can be successfully obtained from the heat of atmosphere or oceans.
The second law of thermodynamics determines the maximum fraction of the
energy absorbed by an engine as heat that can be converted to mechanical
work. The basis of this law lies in the difference between of the nature
of internal energy and of mechanical energy. The former is the energy of
random molecular motion, while the latter represented ordered
energy. Superposed on their random motion, the molecules of a moving body
have have an ordered motion in the direction of the velocity of the body.
This is what is called, in mechanics, kinetic energy of the body.
The kinetic energy associated with the random motion of the molecules
constitute the internal energy. When the moving body makes an inelastic
collision and comes to rest, the ordered portion of the molecular
kinetic energy becomes converted into random motion. Since it is
impossible to control the motion of individual molecules, it is impossible
to convert random motion again completely to ordered motion. But a portion
can be converted and that is what is accomplished by a heat engine. All these
matters and spontaneous thermal processes can be treated quantitatively in
terms of a concept called entropy. Entropy, denoted by S, is a
measure of the randomness or disordered in a system. The more disorder the
greater the entropy. If the disorder in a system increases, then the entrophy
of the system increases. The increase of entropy corresponds with the
increase of disorder among the molecules that make up a physical body.
Rudolph Clausius (1822-1888), who introduced the the concept, stated the
second law of thermodynamics in terms of it:
The entropy of the world tends to a maximum.
The second law is usually stated in terms of entropy of a closed system:
The entropy of a closed system increases to a maximum.
And this can be generalized to the whole universe, since it is a closed system.
This means that the total amount of disorder in the universe is increasing.