As we have seen,
the righteousness of God is the act or activity of God whereby God sets man
right with God Himself. Hence the revelation of the righteousness of God is
this act of setting right, and this act of setting right is called
justification. Justification is not just a pronouncement about
something but is an act that brings about something; it is not just
a declaration that a man is righteous before God but is a setting of a man
right with God: a bringing him into a right relationship with God.
Justification is then essentially salvation: to justify is to save
(Isa. 45:25; 53:11; see Rom. 6:7 where dikaioo is translated
"freed" in RSV). This close relationship between these two concepts
is more obvious in the Greek because the words translated "justification"
and "righteousness" have the same roots, not two different
roots as do the two English words. See my
Word Study
on "righteousness".
In the New Testament,
justification is not just a vindication of the righteous who has been wronged
(this view is in Jesus' teaching in Matt. 5:6; 6:33; Luke 18:7),
but it is also the salvation of the ungodly who are delivered
from their ungodliness and unrighteousness;
JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH
"And to the one who does not work but trusts him who justifies the ungodly,
Justification not only saves the ungodly from their sins, it also
brings them into the righteousness of faith. Justification is not
a legal declaration or pronoucement of one's legal status (the Protestant
doctrine of justification) nor the infusion of His grace in order that one
may earn salvation (the Roman Catholic doctrine of justification); it is the
activity of God for salvation. Justification is essentially salvation;
to justify is to save (Isa. 45:25; 53:11). The righteousness of God
is not justice nor is it the righteousness from God; these are
different though related concepts. The righteousness from God is the
righteousness of faith; it is being set right with God by man's
response of faith to the righteousness of God, God's activity of
setting him right with Himself. To be set right with God is to have faith
in God. And this faith in God is reckoned for righteousness,
the righteousness of faith.
his faith is reckoned as righteousness" (Rom. 4:5).
"Abraham believed God,
Justification, as God's act of setting man right with God Himself,
brings man into faith, in which man is set right with God, that faith
being reckoned as righteousness, the righteousness of faith.
And justification (
Rom. 3:24)
is also
the revelation of the righteousness of God
(Rom. 1:17). Since the righteousness of God is the act
or activity of God whereby God sets man right with God Himself,
then this act of setting right is the actualization or revelation of the
righteousness of God, and this act of revelation of the righteousness of God
(Rom. 1:17) is also called justification (
Rom. 3:24).
and it [his faith] was reckoned unto him for righteousness."
(Gen. 15:6).
"4:3 For what does the scripture say?
'Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.'
4:4Now to one who works,
his wages are not reckoned as a gift but as his due.
4:5And to the one who does not work
but trusts him who justifies the ungodly,
his faith is reckoned as righteousness....
4:13The promise to Abraham and his descendants,
that they should inherit the world,
did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith."
(Rom. 4:3-5, 13).
(See also Rom. 4:9b; Rom. 10:9; Phil. 3:9).
There is a difference between justification in the Old Testament and that in the New Testament. In the Old Testament justification is the vindication of the righteous who are suffering wrong (Ex. 23:7). God justifies, that is, vindicates the righteous who are wrongfully oppressed. Justification requires a real righteousness of the people on whose part it is done. In Isa. 51:7 the promise of deliverance is addressed to those "who know righteousness, the people in whose hearts is my law." Similarly, in order to share in the promised vindication, the wicked must forsake his ways and the unrighteous man his thoughts, and return unto the Lord (Isa. 55:7). However, in the New Testament justification is not only a vindication of a righteous people who are being wrongfully oppressed but also a deliverance of the people from their own sins. Thus, Paul says that God is He "that justifies the ungodly" (Rom. 4:5). In the New Testament, justification is not just a vindication of the righteous who has been wronged (this view is in Jesus' teaching in Matt. 5:6; 6:33; Luke 18:7), but also the salvation of the ungodly who is delivered from his ungodliness and unrighteousness. But justification not only saves the ungodly from their sins, it also brings them into the righteousness of faith. To be set right with God is to have faith in God.
"Abraham believed God, and it [his faith] was reckoned unto him for righteousness" (Gen. 15:6; Rom. 4:3,9; cf. Rom. 10:9; Phil. 3:9).Justification as God's act of setting man right with Himself brings man into faith, which is to be set right with God. Thus justification is through faith (dia pisteos, Rom. 3:30; Gal. 2:16) and out of or from faith (ek pisteos, Rom. 3:26,30; Gal. 2:16; 3:8, 24).
But justification as salvation is not only the deliverance from sin to righteousness but also the deliverance from wrath to peace and from death to life. Justification as deliverance from wrath to peace is set forth by the Apostle Paul in Romans 3:24-25:
"3:24 Being justified by His grace as a gift,Here Paul connects justification with the other two aspects of salvation, redemption and propitiation. Redemption is the deliverance from sin by the payment of a price called a ransom which is the death of Jesus Christ. And propitiation is the deliverance from the wrath by the sacrifical death of Jesus ("His blood") which turns away or averts the wrath of God through faith in that sacrifice ("through faith in His blood"). Christ's death as a propitiation turns away God's wrath from the one who has faith in that sacrifice. The wrath is turned away because the sin has been taken away ("forgiveness") by the death of Christ as a ransom, by which a man is redeemed or set free, delivered from sin. When sin has been removed there is no cause for God's wrath. No sin, no wrath. Man is saved from wrath because he is saved from sin.
through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus,
3:25 whom God set forth to be a propitiation,
through faith in His blood."
(Rom. 3:24-25 ERS; see also Isa. 32:17).
"Being justified freely by faith we have peace
with God through our Lord Jesus Christ." (Rom. 5:1)."Much more then, being justified by His blood,
we shall be saved through Him from the wrath of God."
(Rom. 5:9).
Justification is also deliverance from death to life. Man is delivered from sin to the righteousness of faith because he is delivered from death to life. As sinners we were enemies of God, but through the death of God's Son we have been reconciled to God and are now no longer enemies. To be reconciled to God means we have passed from death to life and we are saved in His resurrected life (Rom. 5:10; see II Cor. 5:17-21). We are delivered from death by being "made alive together with Him" in His resurrection (Eph. 2:5). He was "raised for our justification" (Rom. 4:25). Thus justification is justification of life (Rom. 5:18). To be set right with God is to enter into fellowship with God. And this right relationship to God is life. Justification puts us into right relationship to God and hence is a justification of life. Fellowship with God is established when God reveals Himself to man and man responds to that revelation in faith. Life is a relationship between God and man that results from this revelation and the faith response to it. Apart from this revelation the response of faith is not possible, and this revelation is the offer of life and the possibility of faith. But life is not actual unless man responds in faith to the revelation of God Himself. Life is received in the act of faith. Since God's act of revelation is first, and man's response in faith is second and depends upon God's revelation, life results in the righteousness of faith and man is righteous because of life. Justification as the revelation of the righteousness of God brings about life and the righteousness of faith.
Justification is the free act of God's grace ( Rom. 3:24; Titus 3:7). The source of justification is the love of God. And the love of God in action to bring man salvation is the grace of God (Titus 2:11). Hence justification is the true expression of the grace of God and the act of the love of God. Because justification is a gift (Rom. 3:24; 5:15-17), justification is free and is not something that can be earned (Rom. 4:4; 11:6). Being a free act of God's grace, justification has nothing to do with the works of the law (Rom. 3:20, 28; 4:6; Gal. 2:16; 3:11; see also Eph. 2:2-9; Phil. 3:9; II Tim. 1:9; Titus 3:5). The whole legalistic theology is a misunderstanding of the righteousness of God and justification by faith, and is therefore unbiblical and false. The Scripture nowhere speaks of the righteousness or merits of Christ and of justification as an imputation of the merits of Christ to our account. The introduction of such a legalistic righteousness, even if it means the merits of Christ, into the discussion of the righteousness of God and of justification by faith obscures the grace of God and misunderstands the law as well as the gospel of the grace of God. In principle, the grace of God has nothing to do with legal righteousness and merits. God does not give man His grace by faith so that he can earn merits to gain eternal life nor to show that he is legally righteous before God. Jesus Christ did not satisfy in our place the demands of the law, either in precept or penalty. Christ fulfilled the law (Matt. 5:17), but not for us. Nowhere in the Scripture does it say that Christ fulfilled the law for us. Neither did he fulfill it legalistically. Not because Christ was not able to do it but because God does not in His love and grace operate on the basis of law or legal righteousness. Christ fulfilled it by love, for "love is the fulfilling of the law" (Rom. 13:8, 10).
Legalism misinterprets the righteousness of God as justice, that is, as that
principle of God's being that requires and demands the reward of good work
(comformity to the Law) because of their intrinsic merit (remunerative
justice) and the punishment of every transgression of the law with a
proportionate punishment because of its own intrinsic demerit (retributive
justice). According to this view, for God to do otherwise He would be
unrighteous and unjust. Absolute justice, which according to this point of
view is the eternal being of God, is said to require and demand, of necessity,
the reward of meritorious good works and the punishment of sin. It was this
legalistic concept of justice that gave Martin Luther so much trouble.
In the English language, the use of "justify" to translate the Greek verb
dikaioo and the use of "justification" to translate the Greek verbal
noun dikaiosis seems to imply that the righteousness of God is the
Greek-Roman concept of justice. The English language has no verbal noun
or verb of the same root as the English word "righteousness"
to translate the Greek verbal noun or verb. This deficiency of the English
language does not mean that the righteousness of God is the Greek-Roman
concept of justice.
From this legalistic point of view, man needs to be saved because he is
guilty of breaking the law. Salvation is accordingly conceived of as a
removal of that guilt. Justice requires that the penalty be paid before the
guilt can be removed. It cannot be forgiven freely but only can be taken
away by the paying of the penalty which alone can satisfy justice. Because
of the enormity of the guilt - it is against an infinite moral being - finite
man himself can never pay the penalty and go free. From this legalistic
point of view, man's sin demands an eternal punishment, and being finite he
cannot meet the infinite demand of justice. If he is to be saved at all, he
must be saved by another - one who is man like himself but without sin, but
also one who is God who alone can meet the infinite demand of justice.
Where is such a one to be found? Only God can provide the one, and God has
provided the perfect sacrifice to pay the penalty by sending His Son to
become man. His death is the perfect sacrifice. It can remove the guilt by
paying the penalty. In His death he endured the eternal punishment due to
man's sin.
But from this legalistic point of view, it is not enough just to be declared
not guilty; man must also have a righteousness which merits eternal life. He
must not only have no guilt, no demerits, but he must also have a positive
righteousness, merits placed to his account. Since man cannot earn this
righteousness (merits) himself because of his sinful nature (he is not able
not to sin and not able to do righteousness - good works which merit eternal
life as a reward), someone must earn this for him. According to this
legalistic theology, salvation is not only a vicarious satisfaction of the
demands of justice and the law, but it is also vicarious law-keeping.
Christ's life of active obedience under the law provides the righteousness
(merits) we need; Christ earned for us eternal life by His active obedience
to the law. And by His passive obedience of death on the cross He paid for
us (vicariously) the penalty of our sins. Therefore, the one who receives in
faith Christ's work for him is declared not guilty, and Christ's
righteousness (the merits of Christ) is imputed to his account. He is
justified because Christ has satisfied the demands of justice and the law
against him. He is legally entitled to eternal life if he receives it from
Christ who earned it for him. Thus salvation is understood legalistically.
It is a legal transaction - a fire insurance policy that another paid for
and gives freely to man if he will take it.
This is a consistent and logical explanation of salvation by Christ. There
is only one difficulty with it - it is not true. Yes, Christ died for man to
take away his sin. The fact of Christ - who He is and what He did - is true,
but the explanation is wrong - it is legalistic. Salvation is not by
meritorious works, even though another - even God - performs them. God is
not the kind of God that the legalist thinks He is. He is not a God of law
and justice but a God of love. Yes, God is just, that is, fair, but not in a
legalistic sense. God is fair because he loves all men alike and therefore
treats them impartially, without regard to their merit (Matt. 5:45). The
problem solved by Christ's death was not in God but in man. God did not have
to be reconciled and His justice satisfied before man could be saved. On the
contrary, it is man who needs to be reconciled to God; it is man who needs to
be changed. Man is dead and he needs to be made alive. The problem is in
man - he is dead and he needs life. Man does not need a lawyer; he needs one
to raise him from dead. Only God can do that, and He has done it through His
Son's death and resurrection. God was in Christ reconciling the world unto
Himself (II Cor. 5:18-19; see also Rom. 5:10-11) - not reconciling God to the
world. And since man sins because he is dead, by making him alive God saves
him from sin to righteousness. He saves him not just from the guilt of sin
but from sin itself. And He saves him not just from breaking the law but
from trusting in false gods. God saves man to trust in God Himself - the
only real righteousness. Legal righteousness (merits) is not enough. For
the real law wants faith, trust in and love of God - "Thou shalt love the Lord
thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy might."
(Deut. 6:5 KJV). And since death is what hinders this, God removed this
hindrance and barrier by the death and resurrection of His Son. He entered
into our death so that we could enter into His life - through His resurrection.
Being made alive with Him, we can now trust, love, and worship Him. So then
as sin flows out of death, righteousness flows out of life - out of Jesus
Christ who is the life. Life is not some thing; it is a person
- Jesus Christ - and to know Him and God through Him is to be alive
(John 17:3). And to know Him and His love is to trust Him.
Nowhere in the Scriptures does it say that Christ died to pay the penalty of
man's sin and satisfy God's justice. Not in the three passages (Rom. 3:24-25;
II Cor. 5:21;
Gal. 3:13)
usually cited to support this doctrine does it
say explicitly that Christ paid the penalty of sin or satisfied
the justice of God. In the Rom. 3:24-25 passage,
propitiation
is not the satisfaction of God's justice; neither is
redemption
the paying the penality of sin.
"In whom we have redemption,
THE MISUNDERSTANDING OF JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH
WHY CHRIST DIED
"3:24 Being justified by His grace as a gift,
The
redemption
that is in Christ (Rom. 3:24) is deliverance from sin by the payment
of a price, a ransom, which is the blood of Christ,
that is, His sacrificial death. The price is not the payment of a penalty
but it is the means by which the redemption from sin is accomplished.
through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus,
3:25 whom God set forth to be a propitiation,
through faith in His blood...."
(Rom. 3:24-25 ERS; see also Isa. 32:17).
"1:18Knowing that ye were not redeemed
Redemption is deliverance from sin as a slave master by means of
the death of Christ [His blood] as the price or ransom.
with corruptible things, like silver or gold,
from your vain manner of life handed down from your fathers;
1:19but with the precious blood,
as of a lamb without blemish and without spot,
even the blood of Christ."
(I Pet. 1:18-19 ERS; see also Heb. 9:14-15).
"In Him we have redemption through His blood,
According to the English translations of Eph. 1:7 and Col. 1:14,
redemption is made equivalent to
forgiveness
of sins.
the deliverance from our offences,
according the riches of His grace..." (Eph. 1:7 ERS).
the deliverance from sins. (Col. 1:14 ERS).
"In Him we have redemption through his blood,But the basic meaning of the Greek word aphesis here translated "forgiveness" is "the sending off or away." Hence to redeem from sins is to send them away, to deliver from sin. Jesus "was manifested in order to take away sins" (I John 3:5 ERS). He is "the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world" (John 1:29).
the forgiveness of our trespasses,
according the riches of his grace..." (Eph. 1:7 RSV)."In whom we have redemption,
the forgiveness of sins. (Col. 1:14 RSV).
Salvation is not just forgiveness. It is more than forgiveness of sins; salvation is also deliverance from death; it is the resurrection of the dead. Forgiveness of sins is not enough; man needs to be made alive to God because he is spiritually dead. And he is dead, not because of his own sins, but because of the sin of another, Adam. So the forgiveness of a man's sins does not take away spiritual death because the spiritual death was not caused by that man's sins. Thus forgiveness of sins does not remove spiritual death. But the removing of spiritual death does removes sins. Salvation as resurrection from the dead is also salvation from sin and thus it is also the forgiveness of sins. Thus to be made alive to God means that sins are forgiven.
This redemption from sin was accomplished by the death of Jesus Christ because His death is also the means by which we were delivered from death, the cause of sin. Since spiritual death leads to sin ( Rom. 5:12d ERS), sin reigns in the sphere of death's reign (Rom. 5:21). And since Christ's death is the end of the reign of death for those who died with Christ, it is also the end of the reign of sin over them. They are no longer slaves of sin, serving false gods. Sin is a slave master (Rom. 6:16-18) and this slave master is the false god in which the sinner trusts. We were all slaves of sin once, serving our false gods when we were spiritually dead, alienated and separated from the true God, not knowing Him personally. But we were set free from this slavery to sin through the death of Christ. For when Christ died for us, He died to sin (Rom. 6:10a) as a slave master. Sin no longer has dominion or lordship over Him. For he who has died is freed from sin (Rom. 6:7). That is, when a slaves dies, he is no longer in slavery, death frees him from slavery. Since Christ "has died for all, then all have died" (II Cor. 5:14). His death is our death. Since we have died with Him and He has died to sin, then we have died to sin. We are freed from the slavery of sin and are no longer enslaved to it (Rom. 6:6-7). But now Christ is alive, having been raised from the dead, and we are made alive to God in Him. His resurrection is our resurrection. "But the life He lives He lives to God" (Rom. 6:10b). This is the life of righteousness, the righteousness of faith. And so we, who are now alive to God in Him, are to live to righteousness. For just as death produces sin, so life produces righteousness.
"And He Himself bore our sins in His body on the cross,Christ bore our sins to take them away (to redeem us from sin) so that we might die to sin with Christ and be made alive to righteousness in His resurrection. Having been redeemed from the slavery of sin through the death of Christ, we who are now alive in Him have become slaves of righteousness (Rom. 6:17-18), that is, slaves of Christ who is our righteousness (I Cor. 1:30). Redemption is salvation from sin to righteousness.
that we might die to sin and live to righteousness;
for by His wounds you were healed." (I Pet. 2:24).
Since in those days of the Old and New Testament, slaves were also sold at the market, to buy a slave at the slave market could also be called "redemption." The context of the verbs translate "to redeem" is not the law court but the slave market and has nothing to do with "paying the penalty." The purchase price or ransom is not the penalty for breaking the law but is the means by which the purchase is accomplished. A ransom is given instead or in place of those who are to be redeemed or delivered; it has nothing to do with a substitute paying the penalty of sin to satisfy the justice of God. The context of the words translated "to redeem" or "redemption" is not the law nor the courtroom but slavery and the slavemarket. The redemption of Israel from bondage in Egypt has nothing to do with a substitute paying the penalty of sin; and neither does the redemption in Christ Jesus by His death [His blood] have to do with a substitute paying the penalty of sin, but with delivering us from bondage and freeing us from the slavery of sin.
In the II Cor. 5:21 and Gal. 3:13 passages, "made to be sin" or "a curse" does not mean paying the penalty of sin.
In his second letter to the Corinthians Paul writes,
"He who knew no sin was made to be sin for us,Historically, there has been three interpretations of the phrase "made to be sin" in this II Cor. 5:21 passage:
in order that we might become the righteousness of God in Him." (II Cor. 5:21 ERS).
The substitution interpretation of Christ's sacrifice does not understand this participation and just assumes a legalistic substitution interpretation of Christ's death as a paying the penalty of sin for us. This misintrepretation of this Scripture is based on a legalistic misunderstanding of the righteousness of God as the justice of God. But as we saw above, this justice is not the Biblical concept of the righteousness of God. This legalistic misunderstanding reduces and equates the righteousness of God to justice, that is, the giving to each of that which is due to them with a strict and impartial regard to merit (as in Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics). It is this concept of righteousness that gave Luther so much trouble.
Martin Luther rediscovered the meaning of the righteousness of God in Paul's letter to the Romans. But Luther, using the scholastic distinction between the active and passive righteousness, rejected the equation of the righteousness of God to the active righteousness, whereby God proves Himself to be righteous by punishing the sinners and the unjust. But Luther equated the righteousness of God to the passive righteousness, whereby God gives righteousness to the one that is passive, does no works to receive it, but receives it by faith. That is, Luther gave the impression that the righteousness of God is the righteousness from God.
Now Luther's discovery of the righteousnes of God was lost by those who came after him, the Protestant scholastics. Luther's use of the scholastic distinction of active and passive righteousness tended to obscure the Biblical concept of the righteousness of God. Luther obviously rejected the active sense; but the later Lutheran Protestant Scholastics interpreted Luther as accepting both senses. They also accepted the active righteousness interpreting the righteousness of God as the justice of God that was satisfied by the passive obedience of Christ on the cross paying the penalty for man's sin that the justice of God required before man's sins can be forgiven. Because their explanation of the death of Christ was still grounded in the legalistic concept of justice, that is, that Christ died to pay the penalty for man's sin which the justice of God requires to be paid before God can save man, they had to retain the active sense also. Thus Luther's discovery of the Biblical understanding of the righteousness of God was obscured and eventually lost.
The later Prostestant Scholastics interpreted the righteousness
from God as the merits or righteousness of Christ
earned by Christ's active obedience.
Luther's apparent identification of the righteousness of God
with the righteousness from God lead eventually
to the equating of the righteousness from God with Christ's
righteousness, that is, the merits of Christ, which Christ earned by His
active obedience before He died on the cross and is imputed to the believer's
account when he believes. Scripture was often misinterpreted in terms of this
identification. For example, Paul's statement that
"in him we might become the righteousness of God" (II Cor. 5:21b)
is interpreted to mean that the righteousness of God is
the righteousness from God. Therefore, the believer is righteous
by the "righteousness of God in Christ" which is interpreted as the merits
of Christ that was earned by Christ's active obedience before He died on
the cross and is imputed to the believer's account when he believes.
Thus righteousness from God is misunderstood as merits and
the righteousness of God as the justice of God that bestows
those merits. Thus the righteousness from God is
the righteousness of God.
But the righteousness from God is not the righteousness of God. These are different though related ideas and must be carefully distinguished. Now since the righteousness of God, as we saw above, is God setting right the wrong, then the righteousness of God here is the deliverance or saving of us from our sins in Him, in Christ's death and resurrection. But the righteousness from God is the righteousness of faith. Paul writes in his letter to the Philippians,
"3:8b For his sake I have suffered the loss of all things,Thus the righteousness from God is the righteousness of faith (Rom. 4:13) which is that right personal relationship to God that results from faith in the true God (Rom. 4:3). Paul writes in his letter to the Romans:
in order that I may gain Christ
3:9and be found in him,
not having a righteousness of my own, based on law,
but that which is through faith,
the righteousness from [ek] God that depends upon [epi] faith,..."
(Phil. 3:8b-9).
"4:3 For what does the scripture say?Faith in God is reckoned as righteousness (Rom. 4:5). That is, to trust in God is to be righteous. This is the righteousness of faith (Rom. 4:13) and the righteousness from God (Phil. 3:9). That is, the righteousness of faith is not merit placed to the account of the believer, but it is the right relationship of the believer to God by faith. The righteousness of faith is the act or choice of a man to trust God and the righteousness of God is the act or activity of God to set a man right with God Himself by faith. The righteousness of God is what God does and the righteousness of faith is what man does in response to God's activity. Thus the righteousness of faith is not the righteousness of God.
'Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness.'
4:4Now to one who works,
his wages are not reckoned as a gift but as his due.
4:5And to the one who does not work
but trusts him who justifies the ungodly,
his faith is reckoned as righteousness....
4:13The promise to Abraham and his descendants,
that they should inherit the world,
did not come through the law but through the righteousness of faith."
(Rom. 4:3-5, 13)
Now this idea that the righteousness of God is the justice of God,
that is, that attribute of God which requires that God punish all sin
and reward all meritorious works, also leads to the misinterpretation
of the first part of II Cor. 5:21
("For our sakes he made him to be sin who knew no sin,"),
that the sinless Christ was identified with the sin of the sinner,
including the guilt of that sin and its consequence of death, of separation
from God; Christ paid the consequences of that sin by His death on the cross.
This intrepretation is based on the penal substitution theory of the atonement.
But as we saw above, this substitution interpretation must here be rejected
because it is contrary to the explicit statement in the verse which says that
he was made sin "for us", that is, "on our behalf" (huper hemos, NAS;
see verses II Cor. 5:14-15, and 20), not "instead of" as a substitute.
But since the phrase "made sin" may mean "scarifice for sin"
(or "sin-offering"), Paul may be only intending to say no more than
that Christ was made a sin-offering. But Christ was made to be a
sin-sacrifice for us to save us from sin, to take away our sin (John 1:29).
Thus Christ was made a sin sacrifice to take away our sin
"in order that we might become the righteousness of God in Him"
(II Cor. 5:21b ERS).
That is, that we might be set right with God in the risen Christ.
And
as we have already seen,
the righteousness of God is the activity of God to set us right with God;
that is, to save us from sin (trust in false god) to righteousness
(trust in the true God). As Christ was made a sin-scarifice for us,
He participated in our spiritual death to save us from sin
(trust in a false god), so that we could participate in the risen Christ,
being saved from death to life and hence being saved from sin to righteousness
(trust in the true God).
Thus "we might become the righteousness of God in Him" (II Cor. 5:21b ERS).
That is, that we might be saved ("the righteousness of God")
in the risen Christ.
And when Apostle Paul writes to the Galations,
"Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law,Paul does not mean that Christ paid the penalty of sin as our substitute, but that Christ's death was to deliever us ("redeemed") from our sins and to save us from the wrath of God ("the curse of the Law", see Gal. 3:10). And Christ being made a curse for us, does not mean that Christ died as a substitute, in our place, paying the penalty of our sins, but that Christ's death was "for us", on our behalf (huper hemos), The Scripture that Paul here quotes (Deut. 21:23) does not mean that being made a curse was for another's sins but because he was being hung on a tree for his own sins (Deut. 21:22). And since Christ was hanging on the tree (the cross) was not because of His own sins (He was without sin - II Cor. 5:21) but it was on our behalf to redeem us from our sins and from God's wrath against our sins (Rom. 1:18). Paul does not say that Christ took our curse but that He became a curse for us to redeem us from the curse of the law. Christ's death sets us free from the law and from its curse.
having become a curse for us -- for it is written,
'Cursed be everyone who hangs on a tree'" (Gal. 3:13),
The introduction of these legalistic concepts into the interpretation of these passages has obscured their meaning and interpretation. Apart from the clear and explicit statement of Scripture, it cannot be assumed that this is what these verses mean. Since this legalism is contrary to the clear and explicit statements of Scripture, any interpretation employing these legalistic concepts is suspect. In fact the Scripture explicitly rejects the principle of vicarious penal sacrifice upon which this interpretation depends.
"The person who sins will die.
The son will not bear the punishment for the father's iniquity,
nor will the father bear the punishment for the son's iniquity;
the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself,
and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself."
(Ezekiel 18:20 NAS; see also Deut. 24:16; Jer. 31:30).
If Christ did not die to pay the penalty for man's sin and satisfy God's justice, then why did Christ have to die to save man? Why then do men need to be saved? An examination of Scripture (John 10:10; Eph. 2:4-5; Heb. 2:14-15; I John 4:9; etc.) clearly shows that the answer to this question is that man needs to be saved because he is dead. Man is separated and alienated from God (Eph. 4:8). He does not know God personally, and because he does not know the true God, he turns to false gods - to those things which are not God - and makes those into his gods (Gal. 4:8). The basic sin is idolatry (Ex. 20:2; Rom. 1:25), and man sins (chooses these false gods) because he is spiritually dead - separated from the true God.
And all men have sinned because they are spiritually dead.
This is what the Apostle Paul says in the last clause of Romans 5:12 ERS:
"because of which [death] all sinned."
[1]
"Therefore, as through one man sin entered into the world,Spiritual death which "spread to all men" along with physical death is not the result of each man's own personal sins. On the contrary, a man sins as a result of spiritual death. He received death from Adam, from his first parents. The historical origin of sin is the fall of Adam - the sin of the first man. [2] Adam's sin brought death - spiritual and physical - on all his descendants (Rom. 5:12, 15, 17). [3] This spiritual death inherited from Adam is the personal, contemporary origin of each man's sin. Because he is spiritually dead, not knowing God personally, he chooses something other than the true God as his god; he thus sins.
and death through sin, and so death passed unto all men,
because of which all sinned: - " (Rom. 5:12 ERS).
This is why a man needs to be saved. He is dead spiritually and dying physically. Man needs life - he needs to be made alive - to be raised from the dead. And if he receives life, if he is made alive to God, death which leads to sin is removed. And if death which leads to sin is removed, then man will be saved from sin. Thus salvation must be understood to be primarily from death to life and secondarily from sin to righteousness. And since God's wrath - God's "no" or opposition to sin - is caused by sin (Rom. 1:18), the removal of sin brings with it also the removal of wrath. No sin, no wrath. Salvation is then thirdly from wrath to peace with God (Rom. 5:1, 9).
This salvation (from death, sin and wrath) is exactly what God accomplished
through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, His Son. This is why
Christ died, that He might be raised from the dead. Jesus entered into our
spiritual death in order that as He was raised from the dead, we might be
made alive in and with Him (Eph. 2:5). And by saving us from spiritual death,
Christ saves us from sin. It is by taking away the spiritual death which
leads to our sin that God takes away our sin. Jesus died for our sins -
literally - to take them away (John 1:29). What the Old Testament sacrifices
could not do (Heb. 10:1-4) the death of Christ has done. The blood of Jesus
(His death) cleanses us from our sins (I John 1:7). We are delivered from sin
itself. We were saved from our trust in false gods when we put our trust in
Jesus Christ and the true God who sent Him. We "turned from idols to serve
the living and true God" (I Thess. 1:9). When we were spiritually dead we
trusted in and served those things that are not God - money, power, sex,
education, popularity, pleasure, etc. But when we turned to the risen Christ,
we entered into life, leaving behind those false gods. The risen Jesus
Christ is now our Lord and our God (John 20:28).
The death and resurrection of Jesus was the means by which God removed death -
the barrier to knowing God personally and knowing His love. In the preaching
of the Gospel God reveals Himself to us making us spiritually alive to Himself
when we receive Jesus Christ who is the life (John 14:6; I John 5:12). To be
spiritually alive is to know God personally, and to know God personally is to
trust Him. For God is love (I John 4:8, 16) and love begets trust. The trust
that God's love invokes in us is righteousness (Rom. 4:5, 9); it relates us
rightly to God. Thus by making us alive to Himself, God sets us right with
Himself through faith. Life produces righteousness just as death produces sin.
The
righteousness of God
is God acting in love for the salvation or deliverance of man. This
righteousness of God has been manifested, that is, publicly displayed,
in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ (Rom. 3:21-22). God was
active in Jesus Christ, particularly in His death and resurrection,
for salvation (Acts 4:12; I Thess. 5:9; I Tim. 2:10; 3:15; Heb. 5:9).
Because He is the act of God for our salvation, Jesus Christ is the
righteousness of God (I Cor. 1:30). The gospel or the good news is about
this manifestation of the righteousness of God. The gospel tells us about
God's act of salvation in the person and work of Jesus Christ (Rom. 1:1-4;
I Cor. 15:3-4; Eph. 1:13). God acted in Him to deliver man from death,
from sin, and from wrath. But since wrath is caused by sin and sin is caused
by death, salvation is basically the deliverance from death to life. Man
cannot make himself alive. Only God can make alive for He is the living God
and the source of all life. And God did this through the death and the
resurrection of Jesus.
Because God loves man, He did not leave him in death but has provided for
him deliverance from death by sending His Son into the world.
But God raised Him from the dead. He entered into our death in order that
as He was raised from the dead we might be made alive with and in Him
(Eph. 2:5). Hence Christ's death was our death, and His resurrection is our
resurrection (II Cor. 5:15). He became identified with us in His death in
order that we might become identified with Him in His resurrection and have
life. He became like us that we might become like Him. As the second
century Christian theologian and bishop of Lyon, Irenaeus (125-202 A.D.), said,
"2:14 Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood,
"It is right for me to think this about all of you [huper pantan humon],
"12:5 On the behalf of [huper tou toitotou] such a man
I will boast,
"Wherefore if any man is in Christ, he is a new creature:
[Jesus said]
Since spiritual death is no fellowship with God (it is the opposite of
spiritual life which is fellowship with God), then being made alive with Christ
we are brought into fellowship with God. Hence we are reconciled to God
(Rom. 5:10; II Cor. 5:17-19). The Greek word katallage, which
is translated "
reconciliation"
in our English versions, means a "thorough or complete change." Hence it
refers to a complete change in the personal relationship between man and God.
Because man is dead, he has no personal relationship with God, no fellowship
with God. When a man is made alive to God with Christ, he is brought into
a personal relationship with God, into fellowship with God. His personal
relationship to God is completely changed, changed from death to life.
Reconciliation can, therefore, be defined as that aspect of salvation
whereby man is delivered from death to life. And the source of this act of
reconciliation is the love of God. It is a legalistic misunderstanding of
reconciliation to say that God was reconciled to man. The Scriptures never
say that God is reconciled to man but that man is reconciled to God (Rom.
5:10; II Cor. 5:18-19). The problem is not in God but in man. Man is dead
and needs to be made alive. Man is the enemy of God; God is not the enemy of
man. God loves man, and out of His great love He has acted to reconcile man
to Himself through the death and resurrection of Christ. It is true that God
in His wrath opposes man's sin and in His grace has provided a means by which
His wrath may be turned away. But this aspect of salvation is propitiation,
not reconciliation. Reconciliation should not be confused with propitiation.
God in reconciling man to Himself has saved man from death, the cause of sin,
and hence He has removed sin, the cause of His wrath - no sin, no wrath.
Christ's death is a propitiation because it is a redemption and it is a
redemption because it is a reconciliation, salvation from death to life.
To Continue, Click here.
"For God so loved the world,
Thus God in His love for man sent His Son to become a man, Jesus Christ, the
God-man (John 1:14). He was the perfect man; He lived in perfect fellowship
with God, His Father, and perfectly trusted God throughout His entire life
(John 1:4; 8:28-29; 12:50; 16:32; 17:25). But He came not just to be what
we should have been or to give us a perfect example; He came to die on our
behalf in order that we might have life in Him. Jesus said,
that he gave his only begotten Son,
that whosoever believeth on him should not perish,
but have eternal life." (John 3:16 KJV).
"10:10 I came that they might have life,
And the Apostle John said,
and have it more abundantly.
10:11 I am the good shepherd:
the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep."
(John 10:10-11 KJV).
"In this was manifested the love of God toward us,
He entered not only into our existence as man, but He entered into our
condition of spiritual and physical death. On the cross He died not only
physically but spiritually. For only this once during His whole life was He
separated from His Father. "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"
(Matt. 27:46 KJV) He was forsaken for us; He died for us.
because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world
that we might live through him." (I John 4:9).
"By this we know love, because he laid down his life for us"
(I John 3:16 ERS).
"... but following the only true and steadfast teacher,
The writer to the Hebrews also wrote,
the Word of God, our Lord Jesus Christ,
who did, through His transcendent love, become what we are,
that He might bring us to be even what He is Himself."
[1]
"But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels,...
He acted as our representative, on our behalf and for our sakes.
The Greek preposition huper does not mean "instead of" but
"on the behalf of" or "for the sake of". In the following passages,
for example, the Greek preposition huper cannot mean "instead of".
so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone."
(Heb. 2:9 NIV).
he himself likewise partook of the same nature,
that through death he might destroy him that has the power of death,
that is the devil,
2:15 and deliver all those who through fear of death
were subject to lifelong bondage."
(Heb. 2:14-15)
"For it has been granted to you that for the sake of [huper] Christ
Thus the Greek preposition huper does not mean "instead of"
but "on the behalf of" or "for the sake of".
you should not only believe in him
but also suffer for his sake [huper autou, on the behalf of him]"
(Phil. 1:29).
because I have you in my heart,
since both in my bonds and in the defense and confirmation of the Gospel
you all are partakers of grace with me." (Phil. 1:7 ERS).
but on behalf of myself [huper emautou] I will not boast,
except of my weaknesses.
12:6 For if I wish to boast, I shall not be foolish,
for I shall be speaking the truth;
but I refrain from this lest anyone reckon to me
above what [huper ho] he sees in me or hears from me,
12:7and by the surpassing greatness [huperbole] of the revelations.
Wherefore, in order that I should not be exalted [huperairomai]
there was given me a thorn in the flesh,
a messenger of Satan to harass me,
in order that I should not be exalted [huperairomai].
12:8About this [huper touton]
I besought the Lord that it should leave me;
12:9 and He said to me,
'My grace is sufficient for you,
for my power is perfected in weakness.'
Most gladly therefore I will boast in my weaknesses,
that the power of Christ may rest on me." (II Cor. 12:5-9 ERS).
And thus Chirst died on the behalf of all men, not instead of them;
"For the love of Christ constraineth us; because we thus judge,
that is, in Christ who represents all.
that one died for all [huper panton, on the behalf of all],
therefore all have died," (II Cor. 5:14).
"And he died for all [huper panton, on the behalf of all],
Adam acting as a representative brought the old creation under the reign of
death. But Christ acting as our representative, on our behalf, brought a new
creation in which those "who have received the abundance of grace and the gift
of righteousness will reign in life" (Rom. 5:17).
that those who live might live no longer for themselves
but for him who for their sake [huper auton, on the behalf of them]
died and was raised." (II Cor. 5:15).
"15:21 For since by man came death,
Acting through our representative, God has reconciled us to Himself
through Christ, that is, God has brought us into fellowship with Himself.
by man came also the resurrection of the dead.
15:22 For as in Adam all die,
even so in Christ shall all be made alive."
(I Cor. 15:21-22).
the old things are passed away;
behold, they are become new." (II Cor. 5:17).
"Because I live ye shall live also." (John 14:19 KJV).
"5:18 But all things are of God,
This representative work of Christ should be understood, not as a vicarious
act, instead of another, but as a participation, an act of
sharing in the condition of another. Christ took part or shared in our
situation. He entered, not only into our existence as a man, but also into
our condition of spiritual and physical death.
who reconciled us to himself through Christ...
5:19 to wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world
unto himself...."
(II Cor. 5:18-19; see also Rom. 5:10-11; I Cor. 1:9; I John 1:2-3).
"2:14 Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood,
On the cross, Jesus died not only physically but also spiritually
("My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?" Matt. 27:46), sharing in our
spiritual death. We are reconciled to God through the death of Christ
(Rom. 5:10) because He shared in our death (Heb. 2:9). But He was raised
from the dead, and that on behalf of all men (II Cor. 5:15). He was raised
from the dead so that we might participate and share in His resurrection
and be made alive with Him.
he himself likewise partook of the same nature,
that through death he might destroy him that has the power of death,
that is the devil,
2:15 and deliver all those who through fear of death
were subject to lifelong bondage."
(Heb. 2:14-15).
"2:4 But God, being rich in mercy,
His resurrection is our resurrection. He was raised from dead
for us so that we might participate in His resurrection and have life,
both spiritual and physical. Thus the representative work of Christ
is a participation, an act of sharing in the condition of another.
He participated in our death so that we could participate in His life.
because of His great love with which He loved us,
2:5 even when we were dead in offenses,
made us alive together with Christ
(by grace you have been saved),
2:6 and raised us up with Him,
and seated us with Him in heavenly places, in Christ Jesus;"
(Eph. 2:4-6 ERS).