ROMANS 7:1-6.
1. Or are you ignorant, brethren
(for I am speaking to those who know the law),
that the law has dominion over a man for so long as he lives?
2. For the married woman is bound by law to her husband
while he is living; but if the husband dies,
she is released from the law concerning the husband.
3. So then if, while the husband is living,
she becomes joined to another man,
she shall be called an adulteress;
but if the husband dies, she is free from the law,
so that she is not an adulteress,
although she become joined to another man.
4. So, my brethren, you also were made dead to the law
through the body of Christ that you should be joined to another,
to him who was raised from dead, that we might bear fruit to God.
5. For when we were in the flesh,
the sinful passions, which were through the law,
were energized in our members to bear fruit unto death.
6. But now we have been released from the law,
having died to that in which we were held,
so that we might serve in newness of the Spirit
and not in oldness of the letter.
7:1. Or are you ignorant, brethren
(for I am speaking to those who know the law),
that the law has dominion over a man for so long as he lives?
Paul opens this section with a question.
"Or are you ignorant, brethren
(for I am speaking to those who know the law),
that the law has dominion over a man for so long as he lives?"
This question is not like the questions in
6:1 and
6:15
raised by an opponent, but a question raised by Paul himself to
refocus his reader's attention on a different subject, the law. He addresses
his question to those who know the law, for they will not be ignorant of this
fact about the law: the law has dominion over a man for only so long as he
lives. Are they ignorant of that? The obvious answer is no; they are not
ignorant of that.
7:2. For the married woman is bound by law to her husband
while he is living; but if the husband dies,
she is released from the law concerning the husband.
To illustrate this fact, Paul uses an example from marriage. In this verse, he uses a well-known example from the law of marriage to illustrate that it is the nature of law that any law has dominion and power over a person only as long as he is alive. His example illustrates that the law of marriage binds a man and woman together as long as they are both alive. In this example, if the husband died, the wife would be free from the law which legally binds her to her husband. Paul could just as well said that if the wife died the husband would be free from the marriage law. The point is that the death of either partner in the marriage discharges (katergeo) the other partner from the law.
7:3. So then if, while the husband is living,
she becomes joined to another man,
she shall be called an adulteress;
but if the husband dies, she is free from the law,
so that she is not an adulteress,
although she become joined to another man.
In this verse, Paul drives home the point that death so completely discharges them from the law, that in the case of marriage law, if the living partner enters into marriage to another person, he or she would not be considered to be an adulterer or adulteress. If either had enter into a marriage while the other partner is alive, they would be called legally an adulterer or adulteress. Paul here is not teaching for or against divorce. He is simply illustrating the fact about the law that death sets aside dominion of the law.
7:4. So, my brethren, you also were made dead to the law
through the body of Christ that you should be joined to another,
to him who was raised from dead, that we might bear fruit to God.
In this verse, Paul applies his illustration from marriage.
"So, my brethren, you also were made dead to the law
by the body of Christ so that you should be jointed to another,
to him who was raised from the dead, so that we may bear fruit to God."
We are not under law because we died with Christ to the law and
now belong to Him who was raised from the dead in order that we
might bear fruit to God. We should resist the attempt to press Paul's analogy
here into a full allegory where every part of story has an analogous
counterpart in the application of the story. In the application here, Paul
does not say that the husband is the law and the law dies. Nor does he say
that the woman corresponds to the believer. This is not an allegory but an
illustration with one point of correspondence: death sets aside the dominion
of the law. To try to turn this into an allegory where the woman is the
believer and the husband is the law, just does not fit. In the allegory, the
husband dies but in the application the believer (that would be the woman in
the allegory) dies with Christ. True, the believer dies to the law so that he
can be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead. But this only
means that Paul also used another point of analogy in his illustration to
bring out the truth that we not only died with Christ to the law but we also
have been raised with Christ and are now alive with Him, being joined to Him.
But this does not make it an allegory.
In the last clause of this verse, Paul says the purpose of our being joined to Christ is that we might bring forth fruit to God. Here Paul picks up again the fruit metaphor he used in chapter 6, verses 20 and 21. In the next verse, Paul will contrast this fruit to the fruit we had before in the flesh.
7:5. For when we were in the flesh,
the sinful passions, which were through the law,
were energized in our members to bear fruit unto death.
In this and next verse, Paul explains his application. When we were in the flesh under the law, the sinful passion, which were through the law, were energized in our members to bear fruit unto death. Paul here is speaking to Jewish believers, as he has been since the beginning of the chapter. Note the reference to his readers as "brethren" in verse one and as "my brethren" in the previous verse. The phrase "in the flesh" means "when we were unsaved, apart from Christ." See Rom. 8:8-9. Paul here hints at the real difficulty with the law. The law becomes the unintended aid of sin. The sinful passions are through the law energized in our members. And the result is fruit unto death. In the next section ( 7:7-12), Paul will explain what this means.
7:6. But now we have been released from the law,
having died to that in which we were held,
so that we might serve in newness of the Spirit
and not in oldness of the letter.
In this verse, Paul finishes the explanation started in the last verse.
"But now we have been released from the law,
having died to that in which we were held,
so that we might serve in newness of the Spirit and not in oldness
of the letter."
Referring back to what he said in
verse 4
about being dead to the law through the body of Christ,
Paul uses the word that he used in
verse 2,
katargeo translated "released," to assert the believer's freedom from
the law. The believer was "held fast" in a bondage of the law. The believer
is now set free from that bondage to the law so that he might serve as a slave,
a slave of righteousness (
Rom. 6:18,
20),
in a different manner, that is, "in newness of the Spirit and not in the
oldness of the letter." Here Paul is referring to the difference between
the service to God in the old covenant of the law and the service to God
in the new covenant of the Spirit.
"4 And such confidence we have through Christ toward God.
5 Not that we are competent from ourselves
to consider anything as coming from ourselves,
but our competency is from God,
6 who also made us competent as ministers of the new covenant,
not of the letter, but of the Spirit;
for the letter kills, but the Spirit makes alive."
(II Cor. 3:4-6 ERS).