INTRODUCTION.
The word "tribulation" is a general term in the Bible to denote the sufferings of God's people. In the Old Testament, the Hebrew words sara and sar usually translated "straits" or "distress" refers variously to intense inner turmoil (Psa. 25:17; 120:1; Job 7:11), the pain of childbirth (Jer. 4:31; 49:24), anguish (Job 15:24; Jer. 6:25), and punishment (I Sam. 2:32; Jer. 30:7). In the Greek translation of the Old Testament called the Septuagint (LXX), the Greek word that usually translates the Hebrew word sara is the noun thlipsis, which comes from the Greek verb thlibo which means "to press" or "to hem in", often refers to the oppression and affliction of the people of Israel or of the righteous (Deut. 4:30; Psa. 37:39), while in the Greek New Testament thlipsis is usually translated "tribulation" or "affliction". In the King James Version (KJV), the Greek noun thlipsis is translated "tribulation" 21 times, "afflication" 17 times, "trouble" 3 times, "dead" 9 times, and "anguish", "persecution", "burdened", "die" once each.
In the New Testament, tribulation is the experience of all believers and includes persecution (I Thess. 1:6), imprisonment (Acts 20:23), derision (Heb. 10:33), poverty (II Cor. 8:13), sickness (Rev. 2:22), and inner distress and sorrow (Phil. 1:17; II Cor. 2:4). Often the term tribulation is connected with deliverance, which implies that tribulation is a necessary experience through which God glorifies Himself in the bringing His people to rest and salvation. Tribulation may be the means by which God discipline His people for their unfaithfulness (Deut. 4:30). More often, especially in the New Testament, tribulation occurs in the form of persecution of believers because of their faithfulness (John 16:33; Acts 14:22; Rev. 1:9). The sufferings of Christ provide the model for the believer's experience of sufferings (I Pet. 2:21-25), and in some sense it is a participation in the sufferings of Christ (Col. 1:24). Thus tribulation is viewed as entirely within the will of God, serving to promote moral purity and godly character (Rom. 5:3-4). As such, they must endure the tribulations with faith in the goodness and righteousness of God (See James 1:2-4, where "trials" or "temptations" labels what appears to be the same experience.), thus serving as a test of the believer's faith and leading to greater stability and maturity.
Jesus used the word to describe the way which leads to life, saying, "Strait is the gate and narrow (compressed or tribulatory) is the way (Matt. 7:14). He also said that tribulation and persecution may come because of obedience to the Gospel (Matt. 13:21). Jesus told the disciples that they would have tribulation; they would be afflicted (tribulated) and even be killed for His name's sake (Matt. 24:9). Thus Jesus promised tribulation as the inevitable consequences of His followers' presence in the evil world (kosmos) (John 6:33), something that they should expect as the way of life as a follower of Jesus. The Apostle Paul echoes this same viewpoint when he warns that godly believers will certainly suffer persecution (II Tim. 3:12-13). But Jesus encourages His followers through His overcoming of the world to seek their victory through the application of His victory. They should be of good cheer, be encouraged, because He had overcome the world (John 16:33).
The Apostle Paul told the Corinthians that when he was in affliction (tribulation), it was for their sakes (II Cor. 1:16). Paul also said that he and his associates suffered trouble (tribulation) on every side (II Cor. 4:8) by fightings without and fears within (II Cor. 7:5). He told the Thessalonians that they would suffer tribulation (I Thess. 3:4), but that they would receive rest from their tribulation when the Lord Jesus would be revealed from heaven. At that time, Christ would recompense tribulation on those who troubled the Thessalonians (II Thess. 1:6-7). Paul told the Romans that he gloried in tribulation, knowing that tribulation brought patience (Rom. 5:3). And that tribulation could not separate them from Christ's love (Rom. 8:35). Paul was comforted by God in the midst of his tribulation (II Cor. 1:4) and could thereby comfort others in their tribulation with the same comfort that he had received. Nor was his tribulation light, for he was "pressed out of measure, above strength," so much that he "despaired even of life" (II Cor. 1:8). Nevertheless, he was exceedingly joyful in all tribulation (II Cor. 7:4), counting it as a light thing which was but for a moment, but which, obtained for him a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory (II Cor. 4:17). He exhorted his converts to continue in the faith, telling them that they must through much tribulation enter into the kingdom of God (Acts 14:22).
The Apostle John said that he was a brother and companion in tribulation with the faithful of Asia Minor (Rev. 1:9). Other occurences of the word as used by John in the book of Revelation are in chapters 2:9-10, 22 and 7:14. The last reference refers to "the great tribulation".
These 35 occurences of the Greek word translated by "tribulation", etc. in the New Testament may be said to be representative of its 54 occurences of thlipsis in the Greek New Testament.
The following are a list of the items in the Biblical description of "the great tribulation".
Since Jesus made this prophecy recorded in Mattew 24, major wars, catastrophes and cosmic phenomena have stimulated belief in the presence of the great tribulation. Such a tendency is typified by Hesychius of Jerusalem in some correspondence with Augustine. Augustine disagreed, preferring to interpret such things instead as characteristics of history as a whole with no particular eschatological significance. In modern times, some pre-millennialists have speculated on the trend of current events as possible precursors of the great tribulation, some even attempting to identify the antichrist with such candidates as Kaiser Wilhelm II and Mussolini.
Adherents of the major millennial views place the great tribulation at different points in relation to the millennium. Both post-millennialists and amillennialists regard it as a brief, indefinite period of time at the end of the millennium, usually identifying it with the revolt of Gog and Magog of Rev. 20:8-9. The post-millennialists view history as moving toward the Christianization of the world by the church and a future millennium of undetermined length on earth culminating in the great tribulation and the final return of Christ. In contrast, amillennialists consider the millennium to be a purely spiritual reality from the first advent to the second, a period lasting already two thousand years and to culminate in the great tribulation, a somewhat less optimistic view of history and the progress of the gospel witness.
To pre-millennialists who see the millennium as a future, literal thousand years reign of Christ on earth, the great tribulation is a chaotic period toward which history is even now moving, that is, a decline, to be terminated by the return of Christ before the millennium. One group, which describes itself as "historic" pre-millennialists, understands the great tribulation to be a brief but undetermined period of trouble. Another group, the dispensational pre-millennialists, identify the tribulation with Daniel's seventieth week and with the week of Daniel 9:27, a period of a week of seven years whose latter half pertains strictly to the great tribulation.
Within the pre-millennial movement, another issue has arisen concerning the time of the rapture of the Church, and has given rise to three views:
Thus Bible teachers differ as to the nature and extent of "the great tribulation." Some identify the phrase "the great tribulation" with "the wrath of God". These would interpret the seals, the trumpets, and the bowls of the book of Revelation as an outpourings of God's wrath. On the basis of this interpretation, they affirm that the rapture of Church would occur before the opening of the first seal and the length of "the great tribulation" is seven years, Daniel's sevenieth week, and the tribulation is to be concerned only with the unbelieving nations, Gentiles and Jews alike. The teachers who hold this interpretation are known as pre-tribulationists.
Other teachers interpret the phrase, "the great tribulation", to refer to troublesome times that both the Church and believers shall experience at the end times. They differentiate between the seals and trumpets, on the one hand, and the bowls of God's undiluted wrath, on the other hand. The seals and trumpets, they affirm, refer to suffering caused by the wrath of man, which God uses to encourage men to repent. The bowls, however, are especially designated as the fulness of the wrath of God against those who do not repent. On the basis of this interpretation, they affirm that the rapture of Church takes place after the opening of the seals and the blowing of the trumpets, but immmediately before the outpouring of the seven bowls of wrath. Those who interpret the time of the beginning of the seven bowls as the middle of the seven years of the tribulation period and that the rapture of the Church occurs then are known as mid-tribulationists. Others who affirm that the bowls are poured out, one immediately after another in rapid succession at the end of the great tribulation just before the Church is raptured at the second coming of Christ to earth, are called post-tribulationists.
Recently, in this post-tribulation camp, a new view has been put forth by Jim McKeever in his book The Coming Climax of History (Medford, Oregon: Omega Publications, 1982) that sees the second coming of Christ and the rapture as not occurring at the end of the great tribulation but at a short interval after it. On the basis of Matt. 24:29 and Daniel 12:11-12, McKeever believes that Christ will come to earth 45 days after the end of the great tribulation. During this 45 days there will take place the catastrophic event that McKeever calls "the Great Shaking". Jesus said,
"29 But immediately after the tribulation of those daysThe angel tells Daniel that from the setting up of the abomination of desolation there will be 1290 days
THE SUN WILL BE DARKENED, AND THE MOON WILL NOT GIVE LIGHT, AND THE STARS WILL FALL from the sky,
and the powers of the heavens will be shaken,
30 and then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky,
and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn,
and they will see the SON OF MAN COMING ON CLOUDS OF THE SKY
with power and great glory."
(Matt. 24:29-30 NAS; see Luke 21:25-27).
The Great Shaking is the first part of what McKeever calls "the Awesome Event". This whole thing occurs after the great Tribulation and before the end of the age. This Awesome Event consists of four parts:
The Great Shaking includes the following events:
McKeever's escatology seems to follow the Biblical teaching concerninng the events leadinng up to the second coming of Jesus Christ. But there is one point that raises a problem. Why does McKeever place the 30 days of the 1290 days of Daniel 12:11 before instead of after the Great Tribulation? (Remember that the 1290 days is 30 days more than the 1260 days which is length of the Great Tribulation.) McKeever does not give any explanation why he placed these 30 days before the Great Tribulation. Why didn't he just place them at the end of the 1260 days of Great Tribulation? McKeever does not give any explanation.
Let us place these 30 days after the Great Tribulation.
The angel in Daniel 12 tells Daniel that from the abolishing of the daily
scarifice and the setting up of the abomination of desolation that there will
be 1290 days (Dan. 12:11). This 1290 days is 30 days more than the length
of time of the great tribulation which is 1260 days
(1260 + 30 = 1290).
Then the angel says to Daniel,
"How blessed is he who keeps waiting and attains to the 1,335 days!"
(Dan. 12:12 NAS).
Now this 1335 days is 45 days more than 1290 days
and 75 days more than the 1260 days of the great tribulation.
This means that there is 75 days between the end of the great tribulation
and the coming of Christ to earth
(1260 + 30 + 45 = 1260 + 75 = 1335).
This allows time for the events that Jesus said that would occur
"immediately after the tribulation of those days" (Matt. 24:29);
there would be 75 days during which the event that
Jim McKeever
called "the Great Shaking" would take place,
and then at the end of 75 days the Son of Man would come in the clouds of
heaven with great power and great glory (Matt. 24:30).
The Great Shaking would take place immediately after the Great Tribulation
and at beginning of the 30 days. And then in the following 45 days after
the 30 days, during the first 44 days of which the antichrist will prepare
for the battle of Armageddon, the coming of Christ will occur on the 45th day,
which is the 75th day after the Great Tribulation.
The Awesome Event prophesied by Joel (Joel 2:30-31) is not the 45 days period
but is the second coming of Christ.
INTRODUCTION.
The word "antichrist" is used in the New Testament only by the Apostle John in his first and second epistles:
"2:18 Children, it is the last hour;These Bible verses state the following facts about the Antichrist:
and as you have heard that antichrist is coming,
so now many antichrists have come;
therefore we know that it is the last hour.
2:19 They went out from us, but they were not of us;
for if they have been of us,
they would have continued with us;
but they went out, that it might be plain that they were not of us.
2:20 But you have been anointed by the Holy One,
and you know everything.
2:21 I write to you,
not because you do not know the truth,
but because you know it,
and know that no lie is of the truth.
2:22 Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ?
This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son."
(I John 2:18-22)"4:2 By this you know the Spirit of God:
every spirit which confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is of God,
4:3 and every spirit which does not confess Jesus is not of God.
This is the spirit of antichrist,
of which you heard that it was coming,
and now it is in the world already."
(I John 4:2-3)"For many deceivers have gone out into the world,
men who will not acknowledge the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh;
such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist."
(II John 7)
"2:21 I write to you,Satan sees himself as the substitute for God the Father and the Antichrist as his substitute for the Son of God, the Messiah (Rev. 12:9; 13:1-7).
not because you do not know the truth,
but because you know it,
and know that no lie is of the truth.
2:22 Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ?
This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son."
(I John 2:21-22)
While not containing the word "Antichrist", several other passages of the Scriptures are intrepreted by many Bible teachers as referring to this substitute for Christ who shall appear at the end of the age. In these passages, there are a number of different names and descriptions of the Antichrist:
Christ said that Daniel's prophecy would be fulfilled just before His
Second Coming (Matt. 24:15). Jesus added that the setting up of
"abomination of desolation" would introduce a period of tribulation
unequaled in history. Because Jesus referred the fulfillment of
Daniel's prophecy to the future when He would return, the "prince" of
Daniel 9:26 has been identified with the Antichrist of the end times.
The definite article, used in the Greek text of verse 3, specifies the first happening as "the falling away". The Greek verb of the noun here translated "the falling away" is sometimes translated in the New Testament as "depart". Hence, the passage has been interpreted as:
Some of the early Church Fathers held this view with respect to the Roman Empire. Later interpreters modified the "hinderer" to be the restraining power of human law, not by one government, but by the many governments of the civilized world.
Since the Greek noun in verse 6 that is translated "what withholdeth" or
"what restrains" is neuter, it refers to some definite thing that
will be taken out of the way before the Antichrist is revealed. But
in verse 7, the restrainer or "he who now restrains" is masculine and
would refer literally to some person or individual who "withholdeth" or
"restrains" the revelation of the Antichrist. The expression in verse 7
"be taken out of the way" is literally "will be out of the midst" and the word
"withholdeth" literally means "to hold fast". Thus the expression in verse 7
translated "until he be taken out of the way" (literally "until he will be out
of the midst") may not refer to the restraining power at all but to the
Antichrist. In this case, the restraining power is the power of God Himself.
Thus verse 7 may be paraphrased, "for the mystery of lawlessness already is
working; only there is one who restrains just now, namely God, until he,
the Antichrist, arises out of the midst." And this is precisely what verse 6
says, "And now you do know that which restrianeth, to the end that he
(the Antichrist) may be revealed in his own time." Thus verses six and
seven say the same thing and there is a similar balance in the two parts
of verse six and of verse seven.
6a "And you know what restrains him now" (the power of God)
6b "so that in his time he may be revealed" (the Antichrist),
"For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work;"
7a "only there is one who restrains just now" (God)
7b "until he arises out of the midst" (the Antichrist).
It is readily admitted that this is a human interpretation and that it is not being asserted that it is authoritative as the Word of God. But it is at least as possible as the interpetation that the restraining one is the Holy Spirit, or the church, or human government; it seems to maintain the balance between the two verses 6 and 7 more naturally.
Since this lawless one continues until the coming of the Lord, and is
destroyed by the brightness of His coming, the lawless one has been
identified as the Antichrist of the end time.
The ten horns (Rev. 17:12) are ten kings who will receive power and authority together with the beast out of the sea (cf. Rev. 13:1-10; and Rev. 17:8, 11). They will rule together for one hour just before they make war on the Lamb (Rev. 17:14) -- evidently the battle of Armageddon (Rev. 19:17-21). The beast along with the false prophet is finally captured and thrown alive into the lake of fire that burns with brimstone. All this takes place at the end of the reign of the beast who rules for the final three and a half years of this present age.
The Harlot Babylon (Rev. 17:5) is the great city which will have dominion over the seven kings (Rev. 17:18), as suggested figuratively by the woman sitting upon seven mountains (Rev. 17:3). The ten kings, together with the beast, will war against this great city which they will destroy and burn with fire (Rev. 17:16). this destruction of Babylon will occur at the close of the tribulation period when the seventh and last bowl of the wrath of God is poured out upon earth (Rev. 16:17-20).
HISTORY.
The early church fathers generally believed in a personal antichrist. His identity hinged on whether the "mystery of lawlessness" was interpreted politically or religiously. Politically, the most likely candidate was Nero, who, legend held, would reappear in resurrected form (redivivus) to continue his terrible reign. This interpretation, propounded by Chrysostom and others, has gained prominence in this century through preteristic interpreters of Revelation like R. H. Charles and C. A. Scott. Irenaeus and others, who held that the Antichrist would emerge from a religious context, traced him to Dan on the basis of Gen. 49:17; Deut. 33:22; Jer. 8:16 (notice the ommission of Dan in Rev. 7:4-8.).
The Reformers equated the Antichrist with the Pope and papacy, as had some medieval theologians -- Gregory I (540-604), who taught that whoever assumed the title "universal priest" was Antichrist's forerunner; Joachim of Floris and John Wycliffe (c.1330-1384} also are said to have held to the same view of the Pope and the papacy. Luther and Calvin, the translators of KJV, and the authors of the Westminster Confession concurred in this identification. Roman Catholic scholars retaliated, branding Rome's opponents as Antichrist.
In the idealistic or symbolic view, the Antichrist is an ageless personification of evil, not identifiable with any one nation, institution, or individual. This idea gains support from the Johannine letters and has the value in emphasizing the constancy of the warfare between Satan's manifold forces and Christ's.
The Futurists (for example, Zahn, Seiss, Scofield) hold that the idealists fail to stress sufficiently the culmination of this hostility in a personal adversary. They believe that the Antichrist will usher in a period of great tribulation at history's close, in connection with a mighty empire like a revived Rome Empire, and will dominate politics. religion, and commerce until Christ's return.
John Hagee writes:
"According to Daniel 9:27, there will rise on the world's scene a man of supernatural power who Daniel says, "...shall destroy many in their prosperity" (Dan. 8:25). This man will come out of the European Union and will try to resolve the Islamic/Israel dispute now raging in Israel."This political orator and charismatic personality will make a covenant with Israel for seven years, guaranteeing them safety and protection as a nation. In Scripture he is called the Antichrist, "the Son of Perdition", meaning Satan's chief son (2 Thess. 2:3). When the events of Ezekiel 38 open, the nation of Israel has been given a covenant by this political leader, who is the head of the European Union.
"The Jewish people are confident that the European powers will protect them from any outside aggressor or invader. Israel is aware that Russia is its enemy. For years, Israel has known that Russia has been helping Iran develop nuclear weapons to be used against them. This seven-year peace accord between the head of the european Union and Israel is the near future."
John Hagee, Jerusalem Countdown
(Lake Mary, Florida, FrontLine: A Strang Company, 2007), p. 137.
Not all Futurists agree with Hagee, and there are others (Finis Jennings Dake) that disagree with his interpretation of chapters 2, 7, 8, and 11 of Daniel. According to Dake, the Antichrist is not the head of European Union and there will not be a Unitied States of Europe. But rather there will be 10 united kingdoms from the continents of Europe, Asia, and Africa that made up the whole of the old Roman Empire territory. Consider the following:
According to Dake, after the 10 kingdoms are formed inside the Roman Empire territory and have existed a "short space" independent of the Antichrist (Dan. 7:7-8, 23-24; Rev. 12:12; 17:10), the Antichrist will then come out of Syria and in the first three and one-half years of Daniel's seventieth week will conquer Greece, Turkey, and Egypt, thus reviving the old Grecian Empire territory into one empire. By this time the other kingdoms of the 10 will submit to him without any further war (Rev. 17:8-17). This will give him all the 10 kingdoms of the old Roman Empire area and they will become the 8th kingdom of Rev. 17:8-11. Dake writes:
"In Dan 8:7-9, 23-24 it is revealed that Antichrist will come from one of the four divisions of the old Grecian Empire, these being four of the 10 kingdoms of Dan 7. In Dan 11 it is revealed that he is coming from the Syrian division of the old Grecian Empire. The purpose of Dan 7 over Dan 2 is to show additional events in the 10 kingdoms of 10 toes and 10 horns in the latter days, and to make clear that Antichrist will definitely come from one of the 10 kingdoms. The purpose of Dan 8 over Dan 7 is to narrow down the coming of the Antichrist geographically from 10 kingdoms to 4 kingdoms so that we can better identify the exact country that the he will come from. If we did not have Dan 8 we could teach that he will come from any one of the 10 kingdoms of the Revised Roman Empire, but we would not know which one. Now with Dan 8 we can be assured that the he will come from one of the four divisions of the old Grecian Empire -- Greece, Turkey, Egypt, or Syria. If we did not have Dan 11 to narrow down the coming of Antichrist georgraphically from 4 kingdoms to only one of the four, we would be uncertain about which one of the four he will come from. As it is now, we have no grounds of uncertainty."Dan 11 reveals war between Medo-Persia and Greece, and then the division of Greece into 4 kingdoms (Dan 11:1-4). Dan 11 also reveals that the only two of these 4 kingdoms, the king of the south (Egypt), and the the king of the north (Syria) were to war with each other, off and on, over a period of years. They did war with each other for about 150 years, ending with Antiochus Epiphanes who reigned about 165 B.C. After these predictions of Dan 11:5-34, the prophet skips over to "the time of the end", showing the last day war between the king of the south (Egypt) and the king of the north (Syria), with the result that the king of the north will be the final victor over the king of the south (Dan 11:35-45).
"This definitely identifies the king of the north to be the future Antichrist. He is the same man as the "little horn" of Dan 7 and 8, the "prince that shall come" of Dan 9:26-27, the "son of perdition" and the "man of sin" of 2 Thess. 2:1-12, and "the beast" of Rev. 13:1-17; 17; 19:11-21.
"We can definitely and scripturally declared on the full authority of God's word that the Antichrist will come from Syria, not Greece, Turkey, Egypt, the Vatican, Italy, France, Spain, Germany, Russia, Poland, England, Scandinavia, China, Japan, India, the United States, or any other part of world outside of Syria."
Dake, Finis Jennings, The Rapture and the Scond Coming of Christ
(Lawrenceville, Georgia: Dake Bible Sales, Inc., 1977), pp. 20-21.
CONCLUSION AND SUMMARY.
On the basis of the verses above that refer to the Antichrist, the following statements can be made about the Antichrist.
INTRODUCTION.
The word "Armegeddon" (Greek, harmagedon) occurs once in the Bible at Rev. 16:16, where the prophet John describes the sixth bowl. In this place, the "kings of the whole world" will be assembled together under the inspiration of "demonic spirits" (Rev. 16:14) in order to engage in battle. While the prophet's explanation that this name is Hebrew and is meant to aid interpreters, scholars have a problem as to what is meant by the word and where is the place. The chief problem is that the name (h)armageddon does not appear in any extant Hebrew writing. The most popular solution is that it refers to the mountain (har) of Megiddo (magedon). In the Old Testament, Megiddo was a plain in northern Israel which was a military stronghold (Josh. 12:21; 17:11; Judges 1:27) at which many famous battles have been fought in the area: Israel and Sisera (Judges 5:19) as well as Josiah and the Pharaoh Neco (II Kings 23:29). This area in Palestine is located in north central Palestine on the southern edge of the plains of Esdraelon, west of the Jordan, about fifteen miles from the Mediterranean coast. Armageddon guards the pass from Egypt through the Carmel ridge into the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers.
Other scholars think that the word is a corruption in the Hebrew language ('ar hemda, a city of desire, or har migdo, his fruitful mountain) and points at Jerusalem, the mountain of Israel. Prophetic expectations seems to point to a climactic battle in the neighborhood of Zion (Joel 3:2; Zech. 14:2; I Enoch 56:7). And if the apocalyptic imagery of Rev. 16-20 is derives from Ezek. 38-39, here again we have a picture of the final battle in the "mountain of Israel" (Ezek. 38:7ff.; 39:2).
Still other scholars suggest that no geographic locality is meant, but rather, this name stands for an event. It is that event that is the culmination of history which is the final clash between the forces of God and of Satan, when at the very end of the tribulation, the kings of earth, under the Antichrist, will gather together to invade Israel to destroy Israel. The armies from the East will cross over the dried up River Euphrates (Rev. 16:12-16). They will be gathered by unclean spirits at the command of the beast, the dragon, and the false prophet. These are the armies of of the last ten kings that will rule on the earth (Rev. 17:3, 14). They have joined the Antichrist (the beast), who rules a confederacy of power for a very brief time at the end of the age, immediately before Christ's second coming. They have turn against Mystery Babylon, the great city of the end times, and burn it. Then they turn to fight against the Lord Himself (Rev. 17:14; cf. Rev. 19:11-21). Some Bible teachers identify the invasion of Gog and Magog with the Armageddon battle.
This symbolic meaning of "Armageddon" is often adopted in contemporary theology. The day of the Lord which climaxes history in biblical thought is taken to come in a multinational war (Joel 3:9-15; Zech. 14:1-5; Zeph. 3:8; cf. Mark 13:7, 14ff., 24ff.). Since in Rev. 19:11-21 the armies of heaven engage the kings of the earth in the battle for millennial kingdom, then the rebellion against God and His Messiah will hallmark the end of the age. This thought that a devastating war will typify the end of the world has entered secular thinking. The First World War has been termed "Armageddon" and in a recent film by Francis Coppola, Appocapypse Now, contained apocalyptic imagery. Many conservatives have speculated about the threat of nuclear war in modern politics and have argued for the imminent fulfillment of the biblical Armageddon. Hal Lindsey's well known book, The Late Great Planet Earth, suggests that Armageddon will come when armies of the West are arrayed against 200 million soldiers from China in a feirce battle "with the vortex centered in the Valley of Megiddo".
Bible References to the Future Battle of Armageddon
The Bible references concerning the future battle of Armageddon are found in Rev. 16:12-16; 19:19-21; Zech. 14:1-3; 12:1-6, 9-14; Joel 3:1-2, 9-17. These verses state the following facts about the future struggle between the nations (lead by the Antichrist) and the Lord.